» Articles » PMID: 38296111

Social Desirability Bias is Related to Children's Energy Intake in a Laboratory Test Meal Paradigm

Overview
Journal Appetite
Date 2024 Jan 31
PMID 38296111
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dietary intake is notoriously difficult to measure in children. Laboratory test meals address some of the methodological concerns of self-report methods, but may also be susceptible to social desirability bias, referring to the tendency for individuals to adjust their behaviors in order to be perceived more positively. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether social desirability bias was associated with children's energy intake during a laboratory test meal, and whether this association varied by food type (total caloric intake, snack food intake, fruit/vegetable intake) and sex. A total of 82 children (M age = 9.45 ± 0.85; 50 % girls; 84.1 % rural; 85.4 % White) completed several surveys, including the Children's Social Desirability Scale and had their body composition measured. At lunchtime, they were granted access to a multi-array test meal (>5000 kcal). After adjusting for lean mass, fat mass, depressive symptoms, and parental food restriction, children who reported higher social desirability bias consumed fewer calories from snack foods (B = -11.58, p = .009, semi-partial correlation = -0.28). Boys with higher social desirability bias consumed less calories from fruits and vegetables (B = -6.47, p = .010, semi-partial correlation = -0.411); this association was not significant in girls. The desire to be perceived in a positive manner may influence children's eating behaviors in experimental paradigms. Replication studies with larger, more diverse pediatric samples are needed, as are strategies to reduce the effects of social desirability bias on test meal intake in order to enhance the validity of this dietary assessment approach.

Citing Articles

Social epidemiology of early adolescent nutrition.

Nagata J, Helmer C, Wong J, Diep T, Domingue S, Do R Pediatr Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39870773 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-025-03838-z.


Energy and nutrient intake by 11-13-year-old young adolescents attending private schools in Delhi, India.

Ivaturi A, Giles L, Do L, Rawal T, Arora M, Moynihan P Br J Nutr. 2024; 132(3):392-400.

PMID: 38826089 PMC: 11473200. DOI: 10.1017/S000711452400120X.

References
1.
Baker A, Wardle J . Sex differences in fruit and vegetable intake in older adults. Appetite. 2003; 40(3):269-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00014-x. View

2.
Hebert J, Ma Y, Clemow L, Ockene I, Saperia G, Stanek 3rd E . Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self-report. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 146(12):1046-55. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009233. View

3.
Burrows T, Martin R, Collins C . A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110(10):1501-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.008. View

4.
Ranzenhofer L, Hannallah L, Field S, Shomaker L, Stephens M, Sbrocco T . Pre-meal affective state and laboratory test meal intake in adolescent girls with loss of control eating. Appetite. 2013; 68:30-7. PMC: 3686880. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.018. View

5.
Epel E, Tomiyama A, Mason A, Laraia B, Hartman W, Ready K . The reward-based eating drive scale: a self-report index of reward-based eating. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e101350. PMC: 4076308. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101350. View