» Articles » PMID: 38284448

Reasons for Failure of Noninvasive Prenatal Test for Cell-free Fetal DNA in Maternal Peripheral Blood

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2024 Jan 29
PMID 38284448
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To explore reasons for the failure of noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal peripheral blood, and discuss appropriate treatment schemes after the failure of the test.

Methods: Altogether 41,136 pregnant women participated in NIPT. Blood samples were taken again from pregnant women who failed the first blood collection upon their informed consent. Prenatal genetic counseling or prenatal diagnosis was recommended for pregnant women with final NIPT failure.

Results: The first failure rate of NIPT was 0.737% (303/41136), and the reason for the failure was the low ratio of cffDNA in 135 (44.6%) of the 303 pregnant women. After the second or third blood sampling, the final failure rate was 0.182% (75/41136). The low ratio of cffDNA was the main reason for test failure in 42 (56.0%) of the 75 pregnant women who finally failed NIPT, among whom 44 (58.7%) had underlying diseases, including 21 (47.7%) with more than two coexisting underlying diseases. Only 27 (36.0%) of the 75 pregnant women with NIPT failure underwent interventional prenatal diagnosis.

Conclusions: The main reason for NIPT failure was the low ratio of cffDNA. Postponing the gestational weeks of blood collection may improve the success rate. Resampling and retesting upon informed consent in pregnant women who failed the first test could improve the success rate. For pregnant women who finally failed NIPT, it is suggested strengthening the genetic counseling, prenatal examination, and ultrasound evaluation, and carry out interventional prenatal diagnosis if necessary.

Citing Articles

A Decade of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for Chromosomal Abnormalities in Croatia: First National Monocentric Study to Inform Country's Future Prenatal Care Strategy.

Podobnik P, Mestrovic T, dordevic A, Kurdija K, Jelcic D, Ogrin N Genes (Basel). 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39766857 PMC: 11675109. DOI: 10.3390/genes15121590.


Reasons for failure of noninvasive prenatal test for cell-free fetal DNA in maternal peripheral blood.

Kong X, Zhang L, Yang R, Zhang H, Ren M, Wang X Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024; 12(1):e2351.

PMID: 38284448 PMC: 10795076. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2351.

References
1.
Hui L, Bianchi D . Fetal fraction and noninvasive prenatal testing: What clinicians need to know. Prenat Diagn. 2019; 40(2):155-163. PMC: 10040212. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5620. View

2.
Hui C, Tan W, Tan E, Tan L . Repeated failed non-invasive prenatal testing in a woman with immune thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid syndrome: lessons learnt. BMJ Case Rep. 2016; 2016. PMC: 5174759. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-216593. View

3.
Borth H, Teubert A, Glaubitz R, Knippenberg S, Kutur N, Winkler T . Analysis of cell-free DNA in a consecutive series of 13,607 routine cases for the detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies in a single center in Germany. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 303(6):1407-1414. PMC: 8087552. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05856-0. View

4.
Grace M, Hardisty E, Dotters-Katz S, Vora N, Kuller J . Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016; 71(8):477-87. PMC: 5548289. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000342. View

5.
Hartwig T, Ambye L, Sorensen S, Jorgensen F . Discordant non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) - a systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2017; 37(6):527-539. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5049. View