The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Skin Vulnerability to Irritants

Overview

Journal Skin Res Technol

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 Jan 27

PMID 38279544

Authors

Abdulmajeed Raja Almalty

Saja Hamdallah Hamed

Mohammad Yasser Jebril

Hassan Mubarak Abdelnour

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Electrical stimulation (ES) is a widely used technique in the medical field for various purposes. The effect of ES on several skin properties has been investigated; however, its effect on skin vulnerability to irritants remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of ES application on skin vulnerability to external irritants.

Materials And Methods: An experimental study on 12 healthy male subjects (Mean ± SD, 22.9 ± 3.6 years) who completed the study. The subjects were free of skin abnormalities in the volar aspect of both forearms. Three areas were allocated to each forearm and marked as areas 1, 2, and A in the treated forearm, and areas 3, 4, and B in the control forearm. ES was applied to the volar aspect of the treated forearm for 30 min three times a week, for 2 weeks. The effect of ES on skin vulnerability was investigated using 5% and 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) patches applied to both treated and control forearms. The skin response to irritants was evaluated using transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and a visual erythema score 24 h after patch removal.

Results: Compared to the control forearm, ES increased skin permeability and erythema in response to external irritants (SLS), as measured by the visual analog score (Z = 2.75, p = 0.006) and TEWL (p < 0.05), respectively.

Conclusions: ES escalates skin reactions to low concentrations of irritant substances, such as SLS, in the area between the two electrodes. This emphasizes the use of this substance, and similar irritants should be avoided in areas treated with ES.

Citing Articles

The effect of electrical stimulation on skin vulnerability to irritants.

Almalty A, Hamed S, Jebril M, Abdelnour H Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(2):e13591.

PMID: 38279544 PMC: 10818122. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13591.

References

Bondi C, Marks J, Wroblewski L, Raatikainen H, Lenox S, Gebhardt K . Human and Environmental Toxicity of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS): Evidence for Safe Use in Household Cleaning Products. Environ Health Insights. 2015; 9:27-32. PMC: 4651417. DOI: 10.4137/EHI.S31765. View

Kim Y, Cho S, Lee K . Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization combined treatment on chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021; 34(5):895-902. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-200369. View

Almalty A, Hamed S, Jebril M, Abdelnour H . The effect of electrical stimulation on skin vulnerability to irritants. Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(2):e13591. PMC: 10818122. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13591. View

Day J, Lucado A, Dale R, Merriman H, Marker C, Uhl T . The Effect of Scapular Muscle Strengthening on Functional Recovery in Patients With Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2021; 30(5):744-753. DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2020-0203. View

Gorzelanny C, Mess C, Schneider S, Huck V, Brandner J . Skin Barriers in Dermal Drug Delivery: Which Barriers Have to Be Overcome and How Can We Measure Them?. Pharmaceutics. 2020; 12(7). PMC: 7407329. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12070684. View

Furuhashi T, Oda T, Torii K, Nishida E, Morita A . Dupilumab probably reduces transepidermal water loss but does not increase stratum corneum hydration in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2020; 48(2):e74-e75. PMC: 7891664. DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15638. View

Petrofsky J, Schwab E, Cuneo M, George J, Kim J, Almalty A . Current distribution under electrodes in relation to stimulation current and skin blood flow: are modern electrodes really providing the current distribution during stimulation we believe they are?. J Med Eng Technol. 2006; 30(6):368-81. DOI: 10.1080/03091900500183855. View

Muizzuddin N, Marenus K, Schnittger S, Sullivan M, Maes D . Effect of systemic hormonal cyclicity on skin. J Cosmet Sci. 2005; 56(5):311-21. View

Pinnagoda J, Tupker R, Agner T, Serup J . Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1990; 22(3):164-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1990.tb01553.x. View

10.

Visconti M, Haidari W, Feldman S . Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019; 31(8):846-849. DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1657227. View

11.

Corazza M, Maranini C, Bacilieri S, Virgili A . Accelerated allergic contact dermatitis to a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device. Dermatology. 1999; 199(3):281. DOI: 10.1159/000018270. View

12.

Almalty A, Petrofsky J, Al-Naami B, Al-Nabulsi J . An effective method for skin blood flow measurement using local heat combined with electrical stimulation. J Med Eng Technol. 2009; 33(8):663-9. DOI: 10.3109/03091900903271646. View

13.

Machado M, Salgado T, Hadgraft J, Lane M . The relationship between transepidermal water loss and skin permeability. Int J Pharm. 2009; 384(1-2):73-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.09.044. View

14.

Goetz G, Wernly B, Wild C . Wearable cardioverter defibrillator for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients at risk: An updated systematic review of comparative effectiveness and safety. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023; 45:101189. PMC: 10070821. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101189. View

15.

Dittmar D, Dahlin J, Persson C, Schuttelaar M . Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylic acid used in transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation. Contact Dermatitis. 2017; 77(6):409-412. DOI: 10.1111/cod.12796. View

16.

Almalty A, Hamed S, Al-Dabbak F, Shallan A . Short-term and long-term effects of electrical stimulation on skin properties. Physiother Res Int. 2012; 18(3):157-66. DOI: 10.1002/pri.1543. View

17.

AlAjlan A, Thestrup-Pedersen K, AlEisa A . Contact leukoderma following nickel dermatitis elicited by TENS electrode plates. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 42(3):172-3. View

18.

de Jongh C, Verberk M, Spiekstra S, Gibbs S, Kezic S . Cytokines at different stratum corneum levels in normal and sodium lauryl sulphate-irritated skin. Skin Res Technol. 2007; 13(4):390-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00242.x. View

19.

Deyo R, Walsh N, Martin D, SCHOENFELD L, Ramamurthy S . A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322(23):1627-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199006073222303. View

20.

Porcari J, Miller J, Cornwell K, Foster C, Gibson M, McLean K . The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation training on abdominal strength, endurance, and selected anthropometric measures. J Sports Sci Med. 2014; 4(1):66-75. PMC: 3880086. View