» Articles » PMID: 38271655

Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors Receiving Non-RET Inhibitor Standards of Care in a Real-World Setting

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jan 25
PMID 38271655
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: fusions are oncogenic drivers across different solid tumors. However, the genomic landscape and natural history of patients with fusion-positive solid tumors are not well known. We describe the clinical characteristics of RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve patients with fusion-positive solid tumors (excluding non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC]), treated in a real-world setting and assess the prognostic effect of fusions.

Methods: Data for RET TKI-naïve patients with metastatic solid tumors (excluding NSCLC) who had ≥one Foundation Medicine comprehensive genomic profiling test (January 1, 2011-March 31, 2022) were obtained from a deidentified nationwide (US-based) clinicogenomic database. The primary objective of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with fusion-positive tumors versus matched patients with wild-type (-WT) tumors. Patients with -WT solid tumors were matched (4:1) to patients with fusion-positive tumors on the basis of preselected covariates.

Results: The study population included 26 patients in the fusion-positive cohort, 7,220 patients in the WT cohort (before matching), and 104 patients in the matched -WT cohort. Co-occurring genomic alterations were rare in the fusion-positive cohort. Median OS was consistently lower in patients with fusion-positive tumors versus those with -WT tumors, using three different analyses (hazard ratios, 2.0, 1.7, and 2.2).

Conclusion: These data suggest that fusions represent a negative prognostic factor in patients with metastatic solid tumors and highlight the need for wider genomic testing and use of RET-specific TKIs that could improve patient outcomes. Our study also highlights the value of real-world data when studying rare cancers or cancers with rare genomic alterations.

References
1.
Harder V, Stuart E, Anthony J . Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(3):234-49. PMC: 2936698. DOI: 10.1037/a0019623. View

2.
Subbiah V, Cassier P, Siena S, Garralda E, Paz-Ares L, Garrido P . Pan-cancer efficacy of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumors from the phase 1/2 ARROW trial. Nat Med. 2022; 28(8):1640-1645. PMC: 9388374. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01931-y. View

3.
Bazhenova L, Lokker A, Snider J, Castellanos E, Fisher V, Fellous M . TRK Fusion Cancer: Patient Characteristics and Survival Analysis in the Real-World Setting. Target Oncol. 2021; 16(3):389-399. PMC: 8105201. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-021-00815-4. View

4.
Kato S, Subbiah V, Marchlik E, Elkin S, Carter J, Kurzrock R . Aberrations in Diverse Cancers: Next-Generation Sequencing of 4,871 Patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 23(8):1988-1997. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1679. View

5.
Kohno T, Tabata J, Nakaoku T . REToma: a cancer subtype with a shared driver oncogene. Carcinogenesis. 2019; 41(2):123-129. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgz184. View