» Articles » PMID: 38264006

Characterising Individual Variability in Associations Between Self-monitoring and Weight Change During and After a Behavioral Weight Management Program

Overview
Journal Obes Sci Pract
Date 2024 Jan 24
PMID 38264006
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Greater self-monitoring of caloric intake and weight has been associated with success at both initial weight loss and long-term maintenance. Given the existence of wide variability in weight loss outcomes and the key role of self-monitoring within behavioral weight management interventions, this study examined individual variability in associations between self-monitoring and weight change and whether demographic factors could predict who may best benefit from self-monitoring.

Methods: Participants were 72 adults with overweight or obesity (mean ± SD, age = 50.6 ± 10.3; body mass index = 31.2 ± 4.5 kg/m; 71%Female; 83%White) enrolled in a 12-week weight loss program followed by a 40-week observational maintenance period. Participants were encouraged to self-monitor caloric intake and weight daily and to report these data via a study website each week. Multilevel mixed models were used to estimate week-to-week associations between self-monitoring and weight change, by individual and linear regressions and ANOVAs were used to explore demographic differences in these associations.

Results: Most participants (68%) demonstrated statistically significant negative associations between self-monitoring of either caloric intake or weight and weight change. Of these, 76% benefited from self-monitoring both caloric intake and weight, 18% from self-monitoring caloric intake only, and 6% from self-weighing only. The magnitude of associations between self-monitoring and weight change did not significantly differ by age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, or income, all s > 0.05.

Conclusions: Differences in the effectiveness of self-monitoring for weight loss were not observed by demographic characteristics. Future research should examine if other factors may predict the effectiveness of self-monitoring.

Citing Articles

Characterising individual variability in associations between self-monitoring and weight change during and after a behavioral weight management program.

Arroyo K, Ross K Obes Sci Pract. 2024; 10(1):e699.

PMID: 38264006 PMC: 10804320. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.699.

References
1.
Ross K, Wing R . Concordance of In-Home "Smart" Scale Measurement with Body Weight Measured In-Person. Obes Sci Pract. 2016; 2(2):224-248. PMC: 4970749. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.41. View

2.
Jensen M, Ryan D, Apovian C, Ard J, Comuzzie A, Donato K . 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. 2013; 129(25 Suppl 2):S102-38. PMC: 5819889. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee. View

3.
West D, Dutton G, Delahanty L, Hazuda H, Rickman A, Knowler W . Weight Loss Experiences of African American, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic White Men and Women with Type 2 Diabetes: The Look AHEAD Trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019; 27(8):1275-1284. PMC: 6658112. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22522. View

4.
. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(12):2165-71. PMC: 1282458. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165. View

5.
Foster G, Makris A, Bailer B . Behavioral treatment of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82(1 Suppl):230S-235S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/82.1.230S. View