» Articles » PMID: 38263844

Impact of Technological Advances in Treatment Planning, Image Guidance, and Treatment Delivery on Target Margin Design for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: an Updated Review

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Jan 24
PMID 38263844
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent innovations in image guidance, treatment delivery, and adaptive radiotherapy (RT) have created a new paradigm for planning target volume (PTV) margin design for patients with prostate cancer. We performed a review of the recent literature on PTV margin selection and design for intact prostate RT, excluding post-operative RT, brachytherapy, and proton therapy. Our review describes the increased focus on prostate and seminal vesicles as heterogenous deforming structures with further emergence of intra-prostatic GTV boost and concurrent pelvic lymph node treatment. To capture recent innovations, we highlight the evolution in cone beam CT guidance, and increasing use of MRI for improved target delineation and image registration and supporting online adaptive RT. Moreover, we summarize new and evolving image-guidance treatment platforms as well as recent reports of novel immobilization strategies and motion tracking. Our report also captures recent implementations of artificial intelligence to support image guidance and adaptive RT. To characterize the clinical impact of PTV margin changes via model-based risk estimates and clinical trials, we highlight recent high impact reports. Our report focusses on topics in the context of PTV margins but also showcase studies attempting to move beyond the PTV margin recipes with robust optimization and probabilistic planning approaches. Although guidelines exist for target margins conventional using CT-based image guidance, further validation is required to understand the optimal margins for online adaptation either alone or combined with real-time motion compensation to minimize systematic and random uncertainties in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

References
1.
Wang J, Guerrero M, Li X . How low is the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 55(1):194-203. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03828-2. View

2.
Ariyaratne H, Chesham H, Pettingell J, Alonzi R . Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with cone beam CT: dosimetric effects of imaging frequency and PTV margin. Radiother Oncol. 2016; 121(1):103-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.018. View

3.
Korpics M, Rokni M, Degnan M, Aydogan B, Liauw S, Redler G . Utilizing the TrueBeam Advanced Imaging Package to monitor intrafraction motion with periodic kV imaging and automatic marker detection during VMAT prostate treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020; 21(3):184-191. PMC: 7075383. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12822. View

4.
Hirose K, Sato M, Hatayama Y, Kawaguchi H, Komai F, Sohma M . The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2018; 13(1):106. PMC: 5992771. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1043-9. View

5.
Lombardo E, Rabe M, Xiong Y, Nierer L, Cusumano D, Placidi L . Evaluation of real-time tumor contour prediction using LSTM networks for MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2023; 182:109555. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109555. View