» Articles » PMID: 32583418

A Deep Learning Framework for Prostate Localization in Cone Beam CT-guided Radiotherapy

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2020 Jun 26
PMID 32583418
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a deep learning-based model for prostate planning target volume (PTV) localization on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to improve the workflow of CBCT-guided patient setup.

Methods: A two-step task-based residual network (T RN) is proposed to automatically identify inherent landmarks in prostate PTV. The input to the T RN is the pretreatment CBCT images of the patient, and the output is the deep learning-identified landmarks in the PTV. To ensure robust PTV localization, the T RN model is trained by using over thousand sets of CT images with labeled landmarks, each of the CTs corresponds to a different scenario of patient position and/or anatomy distribution generated by synthetically changing the planning CT (pCT) image. The changes, including translation, rotation, and deformation, represent vast possible clinical situations of anatomy variations during a course of radiation therapy (RT). The trained patient-specific T RN model is tested by using 240 CBCTs from six patients. The testing CBCTs consists of 120 original CBCTs and 120 synthetic CBCTs. The synthetic CBCTs are generated by applying rotation/translation transformations to each of the original CBCT.

Results: The systematic/random setup errors between the model prediction and the reference are found to be <0.25/2.46 mm and 0.14/1.41° in translation and rotation dimensions, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficient between model prediction and the reference is higher than 0.94 in translation and rotation dimensions. The Bland-Altman plots show good agreement between the two techniques.

Conclusions: A novel T RN deep learning technique is established to localize the prostate PTV for RT patient setup. Our results show that highly accurate marker-less prostate setup is achievable by leveraging the state-of-the-art deep learning strategy.

Citing Articles

Impact of technological advances in treatment planning, image guidance, and treatment delivery on target margin design for prostate cancer radiotherapy: an updated review.

Winter J, Reddy V, Li W, Craig T, Raman S Br J Radiol. 2024; 97(1153):31-40.

PMID: 38263844 PMC: 11027310. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad041.


Artificial intelligence applied to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): a systematic review by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO).

Boldrini L, DAviero A, De Felice F, Desideri I, Grassi R, Greco C Radiol Med. 2023; 129(1):133-151.

PMID: 37740838 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01708-4.


Incorporating the synthetic CT image for improving the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and cone-beam CT.

Li N, Zhou X, Chen S, Dai J, Wang T, Zhang C Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1127866.

PMID: 36910636 PMC: 9993856. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1127866.


2D/3D Non-Rigid Image Registration via Two Orthogonal X-ray Projection Images for Lung Tumor Tracking.

Dong G, Dai J, Li N, Zhang C, He W, Liu L Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36829638 PMC: 9951849. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020144.


Visual analysis of image-guided radiation therapy based on bibliometrics: A review.

Yuan J, Li Q, Shen Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(8):e32989.

PMID: 36827068 PMC: 11309653. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032989.


References
1.
Hargrave C, Deegan T, Poulsen M, Bednarz T, Harden F, Mengersen K . A feature alignment score for online cone-beam CT-based image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Med Phys. 2018; 45(7):2898-2911. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12980. View

2.
Kupelian P, Langen K, Willoughby T, Zeidan O, Meeks S . Image-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treating a moving target. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007; 18(1):58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.09.008. View

3.
Balter J, Sandler H, Lam K, Bree R, Lichter A, Ten Haken R . Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995; 31(1):113-8. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00382-U. View

4.
Steininger P, Neuner M, Weichenberger H, Sharp G, Winey B, Kametriser G . Auto-masked 2D/3D image registration and its validation with clinical cone-beam computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2012; 57(13):4277-92. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/13/4277. View

5.
Smitsmans M, de Bois J, Sonke J, Betgen A, Zijp L, Jaffray D . Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63(4):975-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.973. View