» Articles » PMID: 38263826

Computer-extracted Global Radiomic Features Can Predict the Radiologists' First Impression About the Abnormality of a Screening Mammogram

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Jan 24
PMID 38263826
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Radiologists can detect the gist of abnormal based on their rapid initial impression on a mammogram (ie, global gist signal [GGS]). This study explores (1) whether global radiomic (ie, computer-extracted) features can predict the GGS; and if so, (ii) what features are the most important drivers of the signals.

Methods: The GGS of cases in two extreme conditions was considered: when observers detect a very strong gist (high-gist) and when the gist of abnormal was not/poorly perceived (low-gist). Gist signals/scores from 13 observers reading 4191 craniocaudal mammograms were collected. As gist is a noisy signal, the gist scores from all observers were averaged and assigned to each image. The high-gist and low-gist categories contained all images in the fourth and first quartiles, respectively. One hundred thirty handcrafted global radiomic features (GRFs) per mammogram were extracted and utilized to construct eight separate machine learning random forest classifiers (All, Normal, Cancer, Prior-1, Prior-2, Missed, Prior-Visible, and Prior-Invisible) for characterizing high-gist from low-gist images. The models were trained and validated using the 10-fold cross-validation approach. The models' performances were evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Important features for each model were identified through a scree test.

Results: The Prior-Visible model achieved the highest AUC of 0.84 followed by the Prior-Invisible (0.83), Normal (0.82), Prior-1 (0.81), All (0.79), Prior-2 (0.77), Missed (0.75), and Cancer model (0.69). Cluster shade, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and range were identified to be the most important features.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that GRFs can accurately classify high- from low-gist images.

Advances In Knowledge: Global mammographic radiomic features can accurately predict high- from low-gist images with five features identified to be valuable in describing high-gist images. These are critical in providing better understanding of the mammographic image characteristics that drive the strength of the GGSs which could be exploited to advance breast cancer (BC) screening and risk prediction, enabling early detection and treatment of BC thereby further reducing BC-related deaths.

Citing Articles

A Machine Learning Model Based on Global Mammographic Radiomic Features Can Predict Which Normal Mammographic Cases Radiology Trainees Find Most Difficult.

Siviengphanom S, Brennan P, Lewis S, Trieu P, Gandomkar Z J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39407048 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01291-8.


AI for interpreting screening mammograms: implications for missed cancer in double reading practices and challenging-to-locate lesions.

Jiang Z, Gandomkar Z, Trieu P, Tavakoli Taba S, Barron M, Lewis S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11893.

PMID: 38789575 PMC: 11126609. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62324-4.

References
1.
Freeman J, Simoncelli E . Metamers of the ventral stream. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(9):1195-201. PMC: 3164938. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2889. View

2.
Chubb C, Nam J, Bindman D, Sperling G . The three dimensions of human visual sensitivity to first-order contrast statistics. Vision Res. 2007; 47(17):2237-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.03.025. View

3.
Gandomkar Z, Tay K, Ryder W, Brennan P, Mello-Thoms C . iCAP: An Individualized Model Combining Gaze Parameters and Image-Based Features to Predict Radiologists' Decisions While Reading Mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017; 36(5):1066-1075. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2645881. View

4.
Rosenholtz R, Huang J, Raj A, Balas B, Ilie L . A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. J Vis. 2012; 12(4). PMC: 4032502. DOI: 10.1167/12.4.14. View

5.
Waite S, Grigorian A, Alexander R, Macknik S, Carrasco M, Heeger D . Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology - Current Knowledge and a New Perspective. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 13:213. PMC: 6603246. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213. View