» Articles » PMID: 22523401

A Summary Statistic Representation in Peripheral Vision Explains Visual Search

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2012 Apr 24
PMID 22523401
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vision is an active process: We repeatedly move our eyes to seek out objects of interest and explore our environment. Visual search experiments capture aspects of this process, by having subjects look for a target within a background of distractors. Search speed often correlates with target-distractor discriminability; search is faster when the target and distractors look quite different. However, there are notable exceptions. A given discriminability can yield efficient searches (where the target seems to "pop-out") as well as inefficient ones (where additional distractors make search significantly slower and more difficult). Search is often more difficult when finding the target requires distinguishing a particular configuration or conjunction of features. Search asymmetries abound. These puzzling results have fueled three decades of theoretical and experimental studies. We argue that the key issue in search is the processing of image patches in the periphery, where visual representation is characterized by summary statistics computed over a sizable pooling region. By quantifying these statistics, we predict a set of classic search results, as well as peripheral discriminability of crowded patches such as those found in search displays.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the contribution of parallel processing of color and shape in a conjunction search task.

Cui A, Buetti S, Xu Z, Lleras A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7760.

PMID: 40044949 PMC: 11882880. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92453-3.


Heterogeneity in Category Recognition across the Visual Field.

Shakerian F, Kushki R, Kushki R, Pashkam M, Dehaqani M, Esteky H eNeuro. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39788731 PMC: 11772044. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0331-24.2024.


Ensemble representation of animacy could be based on mid-level visual features.

Tiurina N, Markov Y Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 87(2):415-430.

PMID: 39630351 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02976-6.


Distributed attention beats the down-side of statistical context learning in visual search.

Zinchenko A, Conci M, Hauser J, Muller H, Geyer T J Vis. 2024; 20(7):4.

PMID: 38755793 PMC: 7424102. DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.7.4.


The Role of Uniform Textures in Making Texture Elements Visible in the Visual Periphery.

Bertamini M, Oletto C, Contemori G Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:462-482.

PMID: 38665546 PMC: 11045036. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00136.


References
1.
Treisman A, Schmidt H . Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cogn Psychol. 1982; 14(1):107-41. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8. View

2.
Vlaskamp B, Over E, Hooge I . Saccadic search performance: the effect of element spacing. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 167(2):246-59. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0032-z. View

3.
Palmer J, AMES C, Lindsey D . Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993; 19(1):108-30. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.108. View

4.
Toet A, Levi D . The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Res. 1992; 32(7):1349-57. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90227-a. View

5.
Duncan J, Humphreys G . Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol Rev. 1989; 96(3):433-58. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.433. View