» Articles » PMID: 38261621

Coexistence of Many Species Under a Random Competition-colonization Trade-off

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jan 23
PMID 38261621
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The competition-colonization (CC) trade-off is a well-studied coexistence mechanism for metacommunities. In this setting, it is believed that the coexistence of all species requires their traits to satisfy restrictive conditions limiting their similarity. To investigate whether diverse metacommunities can assemble in a CC trade-off model, we study their assembly from a probabilistic perspective. From a pool of species with parameters (corresponding to traits) sampled at random, we compute the probability that any number of species coexist and characterize the set of species that emerges through assembly. Remarkably, almost exactly half of the species in a large pool typically coexist, with no saturation as the size of the pool grows, and with little dependence on the underlying distribution of traits. Through a mix of analytical results and simulations, we show that this unlimited niche packing emerges as assembly actively moves communities toward overdispersed configurations in niche space. Our findings also apply to a realistic assembly scenario where species invade one at a time from a fixed regional pool. When diversity arises de novo in the metacommunity, richness still grows without bound, but more slowly. Together, our results suggest that the CC trade-off can support the robust emergence of diverse communities, even when coexistence of the full species pool is exceedingly unlikely.

Citing Articles

Integrating conspecifics negative density dependence, successional and evolutionary dynamics: Towards a theory of forest diversity.

Detto M, Pacala S Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1572.

PMID: 39592799 PMC: 11599592. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07156-8.


Coexistence of many species under a random competition-colonization trade-off.

Miller Z, Clenet M, Della Libera K, Massol F, Allesina S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(5):e2314215121.

PMID: 38261621 PMC: 10835059. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2314215121.

References
1.
Harrison S, Cornell H . Toward a better understanding of the regional causes of local community richness. Ecol Lett. 2008; 11(9):969-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01210.x. View

2.
Adler F . Commentary on Calcagno et al. (2006): Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition-colonization trade-off is not dead. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(8):907-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00943.x. View

3.
Weiner J . Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 5(11):360-4. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90095-U. View

4.
Kraft N, Cornwell W, Webb C, Ackerly D . Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. Am Nat. 2007; 170(2):271-83. DOI: 10.1086/519400. View

5.
Smith G, Steidinger B, Bruns T, Peay K . Competition-colonization tradeoffs structure fungal diversity. ISME J. 2018; 12(7):1758-1767. PMC: 6018791. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-018-0086-0. View