» Articles » PMID: 38251980

Do Individuals from an SCI-specialized Rehabilitation Facility Have Fewer Secondary Health Conditions Than Those from a Non-SCI-specialized Rehabilitation Facility? Analysis of the InSCI Database from a Middle-income Country

Overview
Date 2024 Jan 22
PMID 38251980
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether attending an SCI-specialized rehabilitation facility (SSRF) is independently associated with having fewer secondary health conditions (SHCs) in middle-income country contexts.

Study Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting: Four rehabilitation facilities in Thailand (one SSRF and three non-SSRF).

Methods: Data from a Thai arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey (InSCI) were analyzed. SHCs occurring within the last three months were evaluated using the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Condition Scale. A causal diagram was applied to create a multivariable regression model to determine the independent effect of attending in the SSRF on having SHC as a single condition and as a sum score.

Results: Three hundred and thirteen individuals with chronic SCI were included in this study. Two hundred and nineteen participants (70%) were recruited from the SSRF. Being recruited from the SSRF was an independent negative correlating factor of the SHC sum score with an unstandardized coefficient of -1.12 (95% CI: -2.00-0.24). Being recruited from the SSRF was also an independent negative correlating factor of having bladder dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, and pressure ulcer SHC with an odds ratio of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.16-0.59), 0.43 (95% CI: 0.22-0.84), and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.24-0.89), respectively.

Conclusion: Attending an SSRF was significantly associated with having fewer SHCs, specifically, bladder dysfunctions, sexual dysfunctions, and pressure ulcers. These results suggest the importance of having SSRF in middle-income countries for delivering effective care to people with SCI and standardized education to health care providers.

References
1.
Leonardsen A, Bjerkenes A, Rutherford I . Nurse competence in the interface between primary and tertiary healthcare services. Nurs Open. 2019; 6(2):482-492. PMC: 6419125. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.230. View

2.
Bickenbach J, Batistella L, Gutenbrunner C, Middleton J, Post M, Stucki G . The International Spinal Cord Injury Survey: The Way Forward. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101(12):2227-2232. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.011. View

3.
Cheng C, Plashkes T, Shen T, Fallah N, Humphreys S, OConnell C . Does Specialized Inpatient Rehabilitation Affect Whether or Not People with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Return Home?. J Neurotrauma. 2017; 34(20):2867-2876. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4930. View

4.
Dryden D, Saunders L, Rowe B, May L, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson L . Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: a 6-year follow-up study. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42(9):513-25. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101629. View

5.
Parent S, Barchi S, LeBreton M, Casha S, Fehlings M . The impact of specialized centers of care for spinal cord injury on length of stay, complications, and mortality: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurotrauma. 2011; 28(8):1363-70. PMC: 3143414. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1151. View