Preliminary Reliability and Validity of a Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale

Overview

Journal J Spinal Cord Med

Date 2007 Jun 27

PMID 17591225

Citations 70

Authors

Claire Z Kalpakjian

William M Scelza

Martin B Forchheimer

Loren L Toussaint

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background/objective: Although the impact of secondary conditions after spinal cord injury (SCI) on health, well being, and financial burden have been studied, there are psychometrically sound scales of secondary conditions in the extant literature. The use of such scales allows for cross-sample comparison of secondary condition prevalence rates and associations with functional, medical, and psychosocial factors. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the preliminary reliability of a SCI secondary conditions scale.

Methods: The Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS) is a 16-item scale based on the Seekins Secondary Conditions Scale. Sixty-five individuals with SCI completed written surveys at 5 time-points over 2 years.

Results: Internal consistency across each of the time-points exceeded 0.76; test-retest reliability ranged from 0.569 to 0.805. Convergent validity was assessed with 6 physical functioning items from the SF-12. Spearman (coefficients were all statistically significant and ranged from 0.317 (accomplished less because of health problems) to 0.644 (pain). The most prevalent secondary conditions were chronic pain, joint and muscle pain, and sexual dysfunction.

Conclusions: Preliminary testing of the SCI-SCS suggests that it is a reliable and valid scale, and further development (ie, factor analysis, item revision) and examination of validity are recommended with larger and more diverse SCI samples.

Citing Articles

Reliability and validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale among the Turkish population with spinal cord injury.

Akpinar P, Atici A, Demir Z, Unlu Ozkan F, Aktas I Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025; 70(4):495-505.

PMID: 40028400 PMC: 11868855. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.14278.

Parkwood's VIP4SCI platform: A virtual e-health self-management solution for persons with spinal cord injury across the care continuum.

Nageswaran L, Giurleo C, Seliman M, Askes H, Abu-Jurji Z, Craven B Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241272618.

PMID: 39184017 PMC: 11342431. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241272618.

Autonomic impairment is not explained by neurological level of injury or motor-sensory completeness.

Burns K, Solinsky R Spinal Cord. 2024; 62(7):367-370.

PMID: 38609568 PMC: 11230852. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-024-00994-7.

Do individuals from an SCI-specialized rehabilitation facility have fewer secondary health conditions than those from a non-SCI-specialized rehabilitation facility? Analysis of the InSCI database from a middle-income country.

Pattanakuhar S, Kammuang-Lue P, Komaratat N, Chotiyarnwong C, Kovindha A, Gemperli A J Spinal Cord Med. 2024; 48(2):290-299.

PMID: 38251980 PMC: 11864023. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2289690.

Effects of Adaptations in an Interdisciplinary Follow-Up Clinic for People with Spinal Cord Injury in the Chronic Phase: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Tijsse Klasen J, van Diemen T, Langerak N, van Nes I J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137640 PMC: 10744320. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247572.

References

McColl M, Charlifue S, Glass C, Savic G, Meehan M . International differences in ageing and spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40(3):128-36. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101264. View

. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002; 24 Suppl 1:S40-101. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2001.11753592. View

Klotz R, Joseph P, Ravaud J, Wiart L, Barat M . The Tetrafigap Survey on the long-term outcome of tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons: Part III. Medical complications and associated factors. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40(9):457-67. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101317. View

Putzke J, Hicken B, Richards J . Race: predictor versus proxy variable? Outcomes after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(11):1603-11. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35115. View

Putzke J, Richards S, Hicken B, DeVivo M . Interference due to pain following spinal cord injury: important predictors and impact on quality of life. Pain. 2002; 100(3):231-242. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00069-6. View

Barrett H, McClelland J, Rutkowski S, Siddall P . Pain characteristics in patients admitted to hospital with complications after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(6):789-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04944-4. View

Putzke J, Barrett J, Richards J, DeVivo M . Age and spinal cord injury: an emphasis on outcomes among the elderly. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003; 26(1):37-44. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2003.11753659. View

McColl M, Arnold R, Charlifue S, Glass C, Savic G, Frankel H . Aging, spinal cord injury, and quality of life: structural relationships. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(8):1137-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00138-2. View

Boschen K, Tonack M, Gargaro J . Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003; 26(3):157-64. DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200309000-00001. View

10.

Garcia Leoni M, Esclarin de Ruz A . Management of urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injuries. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003; 9(8):780-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00643.x. View

11.

McKinley W, Jackson A, Cardenas D, DeVivo M . Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(11):1402-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90251-4. View

12.

DeVivo M, Krause J, Lammertse D . Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(11):1411-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90252-6. View

13.

Charlifue S, Weitzenkamp D, Whiteneck G . Longitudinal outcomes in spinal cord injury: aging, secondary conditions, and well-being. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(11):1429-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90254-x. View

14.

Skold C, Levi R, Seiger A . Spasticity after traumatic spinal cord injury: nature, severity, and location. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(12):1548-57. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90329-5. View

15.

Krause J . Aging after spinal cord injury: an exploratory study. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100961. View

16.

Teasell R, Arnold J, Krassioukov A, Delaney G . Cardiovascular consequences of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(4):506-16. DOI: 10.1053/mr.2000.3848. View

17.

Linn W, Adkins R, Gong Jr H, Waters R . Pulmonary function in chronic spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional survey of 222 southern California adult outpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(6):757-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90107-2. View

18.

Savic G, Short D, Weitzenkamp D, Charlifue S, Gardner B . Hospital readmissions in people with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38(6):371-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101019. View

19.

Noreau L, PROULX P, Gagnon L, Drolet M, Laramee M . Secondary impairments after spinal cord injury: a population-based study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 79(6):526-35. DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200011000-00009. View

20.

Soden R, Walsh J, Middleton J, Craven M, Rutkowski S, Yeo J . Causes of death after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38(10):604-10. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101080. View