Improved Joint Function when Reaching Behind the Back is Associated with Patient Reported Outcomes in Individuals with Rotator Cuff Tears Following Exercise Therapy

Overview

Journal Clin Biomech (Bristol)

Date 2024 Jan 20

PMID 38244237

Authors

Luke T Mattar

Camille C Johnson

Tom H Gale

Adam J Popchak

William J Anderst

Volker Musahl

James J Irrgang

Richard E Debski

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Reaching behind the back is painful for individuals with rotator cuff tears. The objectives of the study were to determine changes in glenohumeral kinematics when reaching behind the back, passive range of motion (RoM), patient reported outcomes and the relationships between kinematics and patient reported outcomes following exercise therapy.

Methods: Eighty-four individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears were recruited for this prospective observational study. Glenohumeral kinematics were measured using biplane radiography during a reaching behind the back movement. Passive glenohumeral internal rotation and patient reported outcome measures were collected. Depending on data normality, appropriate tests were utilized to determine changes in variables. Spearman's correlations were utilized for associations, and Stuart-Maxwell tests for changes in distributions.

Findings: Maximum active glenohumeral internal rotation increased by 3.2° (P = 0.001), contact path length decreased by 5.5% glenoid size (P = 0.022), passive glenohumeral internal rotation RoM increased by 4.9° (P = 0.001), and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores increased by 29.8 and 21.1 (P = 0.001), respectively. Changes in Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index scores positively associated with changes in maximum active glenohumeral internal rotation and negatively associated with changes in contact path lengths (P = 0.008 and P = 0.006, respectively).

Interpretation: The reaching behind the back movement was useful in elucidating in-vivo mechanistic changes associated with patient reported outcomes. Glenohumeral joint function and patient reported outcomes improved, where changes in Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index scores were associated with kinematics. These findings inform clinicians of functional changes following exercise therapy and new targetable treatment factors.

References

Wu G, van der Helm F, Veeger H, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C . ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005; 38(5):981-992. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042. View

Kolz C, Sulkar H, Aliaj K, Tashjian R, Chalmers P, Qiu Y . Age-related differences in humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral kinematics during elevation and rotation motions. J Biomech. 2021; 117:110266. PMC: 7924070. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110266. View

Baumer T, Chan D, Mende V, Dischler J, Zauel R, van Holsbeeck M . Effects of Rotator Cuff Pathology and Physical Therapy on In Vivo Shoulder Motion and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With a Symptomatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016; 4(9):2325967116666506. PMC: 5040201. DOI: 10.1177/2325967116666506. View

Wolfensberger A, Vuistiner P, Konzelmann M, Plomb-Holmes C, Leger B, Luthi F . Clinician and Patient-reported Outcomes Are Associated With Psychological Factors in Patients With Chronic Shoulder Pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474(9):2030-9. PMC: 4965376. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4894-0. View

Bourne D, Choo A, Regan W, MacIntyre D, Oxland T . Three-dimensional rotation of the scapula during functional movements: an in vivo study in healthy volunteers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 16(2):150-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.011. View

Kuhn J, Dunn W, Sanders R, An Q, Baumgarten K, Bishop J . Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(10):1371-9. PMC: 3748251. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.026. View

Mattar L, Popchak A, Anderst W, Musahl V, Irrgang J, Debski R . Associations between range of motion, strength, tear size, patient-reported outcomes, and glenohumeral kinematics in individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022; 31(6):1261-1271. PMC: 9484487. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.032. View

Mallon W, Herring C, Sallay P, Moorman C, Crim J . Use of vertebral levels to measure presumed internal rotation at the shoulder: a radiographic analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996; 5(4):299-306. DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(96)80057-7. View

Anderst W, Tashman S . A method to estimate in vivo dynamic articular surface interaction. J Biomech. 2003; 36(9):1291-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00157-x. View

10.

de Witte P, Henseler J, Nagels J, Vliet Vlieland T, Nelissen R . The Western Ontario rotator cuff index in rotator cuff disease patients: a comprehensive reliability and responsiveness validation study. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(7):1611-9. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512446591. View

11.

Croft P, Pope D, Zonca M, ONeill T, Silman A . Measurement of shoulder related disability: results of a validation study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994; 53(8):525-8. PMC: 1005393. DOI: 10.1136/ard.53.8.525. View

12.

Tashjian R, Deloach J, Green A, Porucznik C, Powell A . Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(2):296-303. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01296. View

13.

McClure P, Michener L . Staged Approach for Rehabilitation Classification: Shoulder Disorders (STAR-Shoulder). Phys Ther. 2014; 95(5):791-800. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140156. View

14.

Michener L, McClure P, Sennett B . American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11(6):587-94. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096. View

15.

Parsons I, Apreleva M, Fu F, Woo S . The effect of rotator cuff tears on reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20(3):439-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00137-1. View

16.

Bey M, Kline S, Zauel R, Kolowich P, Lock T . In Vivo Measurement of Glenohumeral Joint Contact Patterns. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2011; 2010. PMC: 3086287. DOI: 10.1155/2010/162136. View

17.

Berth A, Pap G, Neuman W, Awiszus F . Central neuromuscular dysfunction of the deltoid muscle in patients with chronic rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009; 10(3):135-41. PMC: 2744738. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-009-0061-7. View

18.

Knight K . Knee rehabilitation by the daily adjustable progressive resistive exercise technique. Am J Sports Med. 1979; 7(6):336-7. DOI: 10.1177/036354657900700605. View

19.

Stackhouse S, Sweitzer B, McClure P . The effect of experimental shoulder pain on contralateral muscle force and activation. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019; 37(11):1227-1234. PMC: 7202978. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1686670. View

20.

Kelley M, Shaffer M, Kuhn J, Michener L, Seitz A, Uhl T . Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013; 43(5):A1-31. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.0302. View