» Articles » PMID: 38243604

Evaluating AAPM-TG-218 Recommendations: Gamma Index Tolerance and Action Limits in IMRT and VMAT Quality Assurance Using SunCHECK

Overview
Date 2024 Jan 20
PMID 38243604
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to improve the safety and accuracy of radiotherapy by establishing tolerance (TL) and action (AL) limits for the gamma index in patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using SunCHECK software, as per AAPM TG-218 report recommendations.

Methods: The study included 125 patients divided into six groups by treatment regions (H&N, thoracic and pelvic) and techniques (VMAT, IMRT). SunCHECK was used to calculate the gamma passing rate (%GP) and dose error (%DE) for each patient, for the planning target volume and organs at risk (OARs). The TL and AL were then determined for each group according to TG-218 recommendations. We conducted a comprehensive analysis to compare %DE among different groups and examined the relationship between %GP and %DE.

Results: The TL and AL of all groups were more stringent than the common standard as defined by the TG218 report. The TL and AL values of the groups differed significantly, and the values for the thoracic groups were lower for both VMAT and IMRT. The %DE of the parameters D, D, and D in the planning target volume, and D and D in OARs were significantly different. The dose deviation of VMAT was larger than IMRT, especially in the thoracic group. A %GP and %DE correlation analysis showed a strong correlation for the planning target volume, but a weak correlation for the OARs. Additionally, a significant correlation existed between %GP of SunCHECK and Delta4.

Conclusion: The study established TL and AL values tailored to various anatomical regions and treatment techniques at our institution. Establishing PSQA workflows for VMAT and IMRT offers valuable clinical insights and guidance. We also suggest developing a standard combining clinically relevant metrics with %GP to evaluate PSQA results comprehensively.

Citing Articles

Comparative Study of Fluence Distribution and Point Dose Using Arc-check and Delta Phantoms.

Singh S, Bhushan M, Singh B, Kumar A, Dipesh , Singh A J Med Phys. 2025; 49(4):706-709.

PMID: 39926143 PMC: 11801088. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_130_24.


Evaluating AAPM-TG-218 recommendations: Gamma index tolerance and action limits in IMRT and VMAT quality assurance using SunCHECK.

Deng J, Liu S, Huang Y, Li X, Wu X J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(6):e14277.

PMID: 38243604 PMC: 11163510. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14277.

References
1.
Hirashima H, Ono T, Nakamura M, Miyabe Y, Mukumoto N, Iramina H . Improvement of prediction and classification performance for gamma passing rate by using plan complexity and dosiomics features. Radiother Oncol. 2020; 153:250-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.031. View

2.
Malatesta T, Scaggion A, Romana Giglioli F, Belmonte G, Casale M, Colleoni P . Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: a systematic review of measurement-based methods. Phys Med Biol. 2023; 68(21). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf43a. View

3.
Steers J, Fraass B . IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity. Med Phys. 2021; 48(9):5367-5381. DOI: 10.1002/mp.14997. View

4.
Kimura Y, Kadoya N, Oku Y, Jingu K . Development of a deep learning-based error detection system without error dose maps in the patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy. J Radiat Res. 2023; 64(4):728-737. PMC: 10354858. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad028. View

5.
Kim J, Han J, Hsia A, Li S, Xu Z, Ryu S . Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 5:31-36. PMC: 7807868. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.003. View