Single Versus Double Blastocyst Transfer in First and Second Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycle in Advance-aged Women: a Two-center Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview

Journal BMC Womens Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Jan 18

PMID 38238733

Authors

Yuxi Zhou

Hui Ji

Mianqiu Zhang

Juanjuan Zhang

Xin Li

Junqiang Zhang

Xiufeng Ling

Li Chen

Chun Zhao

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The present evidence is deficient for the trade-offs between the pros and cons of single blastocyst transfer (SBT) versus double blastocyst transfer (DBT) in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles for women in advanced reproductive age, especially in the second cycle. The current study aimed to investigate the impact of transferred blastocyst numbers on pregnancy outcomes in the first and second embryo transfer for women ≥ 35 years.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including 1284 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles from two reproductive centers. We analyzed the pregnancy outcomes after SBT and DBT in the first and second FBT cycles. Moreover, stratified analysis was conducted by maternal age.

Results: In the first FBT cycle, the LBR was higher in the DBT group than that in the SBT group [52.3% vs. 33.9%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.26-2.15, P < 0.001]. However, the LBR of the DBT group showed no remarkable difference compared with that of the SBT group in the second cycle of FBT (44.3% vs. 33.3%; aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.81-2.08; P = 0.271). Furthermore, stratified analysis by age showed a higher LBR for the DBT group than the SBT group in patients aged 38-42 years (43.1% vs. 33.9%; aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.05-4.90; P = 0.036).

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that the SBT regimen is a better choice for both, the first and second frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, for women aged 35-37 years. Additionally, the DBT regimen is still recommended to achieve a high LBR in women aged 38-42 years in the second FBT cycle. These findings may be beneficial for deciding the embryo transfer regimens in women of advanced reproductive age.

References

Tannus S, Son W, Dahan M . Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 34(6):741-748. PMC: 5445045. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0906-6. View

Gardner D, Schoolcraft W . Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 11(3):307-11. DOI: 10.1097/00001703-199906000-00013. View

Bergh C . Single embryo transfer: a mini-review. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(2):323-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh744. View

Forman E, Hong K, Franasiak J, Scott Jr R . Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 210(2):157.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.016. View

Kamath M, Mascarenhas M, Kirubakaran R, Bhattacharya S . Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 8:CD003416. PMC: 8094586. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub5. View

Niinimaki M, Suikkari A, Makinen S, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Martikainen H . Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years. Hum Reprod. 2012; 28(2):331-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des399. View

Chen X, Zhang J, Wu X, Cao S, Zhou L, Wang Y . Trophectoderm morphology predicts outcomes of pregnancy in vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in a Chinese population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014; 31(11):1475-81. PMC: 4389933. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0317-x. View

Kaing A, Kroener L, Tassin R, Li M, Liu L, Buyalos R . Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 35(1):119-125. PMC: 5758461. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1038-8. View

Sazonova A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Wennerholm U, Bergh C . Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2012; 99(3):731-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023. View

10.

Mullin C, Fino M, Talebian S, Krey L, Licciardi F, Grifo J . Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst transfer versus double blastocyst transfer stratified by age. Fertil Steril. 2009; 93(6):1837-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.137. View

11.

Chambers G, Illingworth P, Sullivan E . Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia. Med J Aust. 2011; 195(10):594-8. DOI: 10.5694/mja10.11448. View

12.

. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011; 97(4):835-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.050. View

13.

Balasch J, Gratacos E . Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011; 29(4):263-73. DOI: 10.1159/000323142. View

14.

. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021; 116(3):651-654. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.050. View

15.

McLernon D, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies M, De Neubourg D, Dumoulin J . Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2010; 341:c6945. PMC: 3006495. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c6945. View

16.

Chen S, Du H, Liu J, Liu H, Li L, He Y . Live birth rate and neonatal outcomes of different quantities and qualities of frozen transferred blastocyst in patients requiring whole embryo freezing stratified by age. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):655. PMC: 7596959. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03353-5. View

17.

Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S . Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 17(1):107-20. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmq028. View

18.

van Loendersloot L, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt P, Repping S, van der Veen F . Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16(6):577-89. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmq015. View

19.

Eum J, Park J, Kim S, Paek S, Seok H, Chang E . Clinical outcomes of single versus double blastocyst transfer in fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016; 43(3):164-8. PMC: 5039309. DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.164. View

20.

van Loendersloot L, Moolenaar L, van Wely M, Repping S, Bossuyt P, Hompes P . Cost-effectiveness of single versus double embryo transfer in IVF in relation to female age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 214:25-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.031. View