Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes from the BEST Trial: Single Embryo Transfer with Aneuploidy Screening Improves Outcomes After in Vitro Fertilization Without Compromising Delivery Rates
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: We sought to determine whether performing elective single embryo transfer (eSET) after trophectoderm biopsy and rapid aneuploidy screening results in improved obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with transferring 2 untested embryos.
Study Design: The Blastocyst Euploid Selective Transfer (BEST) Trial enrolled infertile couples with a female partner up to age 42 years who were undergoing in vitro fertilization. They were randomized to receive transfer of a single euploid embryo (eSET) or to the standard of care with transfer of 2 embryos that were not biopsied for aneuploidy screening (untested 2-embryo transfer). Gestational age at delivery, birthweight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) lengths of stay were compared with Mann-Whitney U. The risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight, and NICU admission were compared with χ(2).
Results: Among the 175 randomized patients, the delivery rates were similar (69% after euploid eSET vs 72% after untested 2-embryo transfer; P = .6) through the fresh cycle and up to 1 frozen transfer, with a dramatic difference in multiple births (1.6% vs 47%; P < .0001). The risk of preterm delivery (P = .03), low birthweight (P = .002), and NICU admission (P = .04) were significantly higher after untested 2-embryo transfer. Babies born after untested 2-embryo transfer spent >5 times as many days in the NICU (479 vs 93 days; P = .03).
Conclusion: By enhancing embryo selection with a validated method of aneuploidy screening, a single euploid embryo with high reproductive potential can be selected for transfer. Using this approach, eSET can be performed without compromising delivery rates and improving the chance of having a healthy, term singleton delivery after in vitro fertilization.
He T, Shi W, Xue X, Shi J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):74.
PMID: 39871174 PMC: 11770986. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07107-5.
Comparative study on pregnancy complications: PGT-A vs. IVF-ET with gender-specific outcomes.
Guo L, Li X, Guo A, Wang Y, Liang Y, Li Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1453083.
PMID: 39574950 PMC: 11579861. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1453083.
Kim H, Claffey A, Doody K, Doody K J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(9):2301-2310.
PMID: 39085741 PMC: 11405601. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03208-4.
Van Heertum K, DeVilbiss E, Goldfarb J, Mumford S, Weinerman R F S Rep. 2024; 5(1):47-54.
PMID: 38524204 PMC: 10958688. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.01.005.
Zhou Y, Ji H, Zhang M, Zhang J, Li X, Zhang J BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):51.
PMID: 38238733 PMC: 10795208. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02753-x.