» Articles » PMID: 38204793

Instructing Somebody else to Act: Motor Co-representations in the Instructor

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38204793
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Instructions enable humans to perform novel tasks quickly. This is achieved by creating and activating the instruction representation for upcoming tasks, which can then modulate ongoing task behaviour in an almost 'reflexive' manner, an effect called instruction-based reflexivity. While most research has focused on understanding how verbal instructions are represented within the 'instructed' (i.e. the person receiving instructions), here we focus on how the instructor's (i.e. the person giving instructions) behaviour is affected through instructing. In a series of three experiments and one pooled analysis, we extended the classical instruction-based reflexivity paradigm to a novel social variant in which the instructions are given by an instructor (rather than visual computer-generated instructions). We found an instruction-based reflexivity effect for the instructor, that is, the instructor's task performance was better on congruent compared to incongruent trials (i.e. Experiments 1 and 2, pooled analysis). This suggests that the instructor represents the instructions of the instructed in an action-oriented format. However, this did not depend on the specific task of the instructed (i.e. Experiment 1), nor is it exclusively social (i.e. Experiment 3).

Citing Articles

How a co-actor's (Un-) reliability modulates goal selection in a novel joint goal-setting paradigm.

Gotz F, Dreisbach G Psychol Res. 2024; 89(1):18.

PMID: 39547989 PMC: 11567990. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02056-2.


Instructing somebody else to act: motor co-representations in the instructor.

Van der Biest M, Pedinoff R, Verbruggen F, Brass M, Kuhlen A R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(1):230839.

PMID: 38204793 PMC: 10776225. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230839.

References
1.
van Doorn J, den Bergh D, Bohm U, Dablander F, Derks K, Draws T . The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 28(3):813-826. PMC: 8219590. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5. View

2.
Abrahamse E, Braem S, De Houwer J, Liefooghe B . Tenacious instructions: How to dismantle newly instructed task rules?. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022; 151(11):2812-2832. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001233. View

3.
Brass M, Liefooghe B, Braem S, De Houwer J . Following new task instructions: Evidence for a dissociation between knowing and doing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017; 81(Pt A):16-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.012. View

4.
Dovis S, Van der Oord S, Wiers R, Prins P . Can motivation normalize working memory and task persistence in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? The effects of money and computer-gaming. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011; 40(5):669-81. PMC: 3375007. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-011-9601-8. View

5.
Kray J, Eber J, Karbach J . Verbal self-instructions in task switching: a compensatory tool for action-control deficits in childhood and old age?. Dev Sci. 2008; 11(2):223-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00673.x. View