» Articles » PMID: 38204446

A Multicenter Study on Efficacy of Dual-target Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer and a Consistent Analysis of Efficacy Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapy by Miller-Payne and RCB Pathological Evaluation Systems (CSBrS-026)

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38204446
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing pathological complete response (pCR) rate in early breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant dual-target [trastuzumab (H) + pertuzumab (P)] therapy combined with chemotherapy. Additionally, the consistency of the Miller-Payne and residual cancer burden (RCB) systems in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for early human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)+ breast cancer was analyzed.

Methods: The clinicopathological data of female patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer who received dual-target neoadjuvant therapy at 26 hospitals of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) from March 2019 to December 2021 were collected. Patients were allocated to four groups: the HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+/hormone receptor (HR)-, IHC3+/HR+, IHC2+ hybridization (ISH)+/HR- and IHC2+ ISH+/HR+ groups. The overall pCR rate for patients, the pCR rate in each group and the factors affecting the pCR rate were analyzed. The consistency between the Miller-Payne and RCB systems in assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy was analyzed.

Results: From March 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, 77,376 female patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated at 26 hospitals; 18,853 (24.4%) of these patients were HER2+. After exclusion of unqualified patients, 2,395 patients who received neoadjuvant dual-target (H+P) therapy combined with chemotherapy were included in this study. The overall pCR rate was 53.0%, and the patients' HR statuses and different HER2+ statuses were significantly correlated with the pCR rate (P0.05). The consistency of the pathological efficacy assessed by the Miller-Payne and RCB systems was 88.0% (=0.717, P0.001).

Conclusions: Different HER2 expression statuses and HR expression statuses are correlated with the pCR rate after dual-target neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ breast cancer patients. There is a relatively good consistency between Miller-Payne and RCB systems in evaluating the pathologic efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2+ breast cancer.

Citing Articles

HER2-low status improves prognosis prediction in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment: A comparison of pathological stage, modified CPS+EG scoring system, and Neo-Bioscore.

Lu Y, Zhu S, Wu C, Fei X, Shen K, Chen X Chin J Cancer Res. 2025; 36(6):729-741.

PMID: 39802892 PMC: 11724176. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.10.


The complex interplay of tumor-infiltrating cells in driving therapeutic resistance pathways.

Li D, Shao F, Yu Q, Wu R, Tuo Z, Wang J Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):405.

PMID: 39160622 PMC: 11331645. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01776-7.


Advances in regional nodal management of early-stage breast cancer.

Bi Z, Wang Y Chin J Cancer Res. 2024; 36(2):215-225.

PMID: 38751438 PMC: 11090791. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.02.08.


Pyrotinib is effective in both trastuzumab-sensitive and primary resistant HER2-positive breast tumors.

Zhang J, Yin G, Ye C, Feng M, Ji C, Zhou W Chin J Cancer Res. 2024; 36(2):124-137.

PMID: 38751436 PMC: 11090794. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.02.03.


Sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes with complete trastuzumab and pertuzumab treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: A phase II single-arm study.

Yang Y, Jin L, Li Y, Rao N, Gong C, Li S Chin J Cancer Res. 2024; 36(1):55-65.

PMID: 38455369 PMC: 10915636. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.06.

References
1.
Ogston K, Miller I, Payne S, Hutcheon A, Sarkar T, Smith I . A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast. 2003; 12(5):320-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00106-1. View

2.
Escriva-de-Romani S, Arumi M, Bellet M, Saura C . HER2-positive breast cancer: Current and new therapeutic strategies. Breast. 2018; 39:80-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.03.006. View

3.
Hammond M, Hayes D, Dowsett M, Allred D, Hagerty K, Badve S . American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010; 134(6):907-22. PMC: 3073033. DOI: 10.5858/134.6.907. View

4.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

5.
Wolff A, Hammond M, Allison K, Harvey B, Mangu P, Bartlett J . Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(20):2105-2122. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8738. View