» Articles » PMID: 20524868

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of immunohistochemical (IHC) estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer and the utility of these receptors as predictive markers.

Methods: The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance.

Results: Up to 20% of current IHC determinations of ER and PgR testing worldwide may be inaccurate (false negative or false positive). Most of the issues with testing have occurred because of variation in preanalytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria.

Recommendations: The Panel recommends that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance is proposed. Elements to reliably reduce assay variation are specified. It is recommended that ER and PgR assays be considered positive if there are at least 1% positive tumor nuclei in the sample on testing in the presence of expected reactivity of internal (normal epithelial elements) and external controls. The absence of benefit from endocrine therapy for women with ER-negative invasive breast cancers has been confirmed in large overviews of randomized clinical trials.

Citing Articles

Ultrasound localization microscopy in the diagnosis of breast tumors and prediction of relevant histologic biomarkers associated with prognosis in humans: the protocol for a prospective, multicenter study.

Li J, Chen L, Wang R, Zhu J, Li A, Li J BMC Med Imaging. 2025; 25(1):13.

PMID: 39780089 PMC: 11715691. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01535-7.


A prediction model based on dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography for distinguishing nonluminal from luminal invasive breast cancer.

Liu J, Wang L, Ai Z, Jian L, Yang M, Liu S Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):8672-8685.

PMID: 39698719 PMC: 11651959. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-598.


Estrogen Receptor-targeted PET Imaging for Breast Cancer.

Zhou W, Franc B, DeMartini W, Rosen E Radiology. 2024; 312(2):e240315.

PMID: 39136565 PMC: 11366667. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.240315.


Significance of RCC2, Rac1 and p53 Expression in Breast Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma; An Immunohistochemical Study.

Hemida A, Abdelaziz R, Abd El-Wahed M, Asaad N, Serag El-Dien M, Elshahat Ali H Iran J Pathol. 2024; 19(2):177-192.

PMID: 39118792 PMC: 11304461. DOI: 10.30699/IJP.2024.2014367.3198.


Predicting hormone receptor status in invasive breast cancer through radiomics analysis of long-axis and short-axis ultrasound planes.

Wu J, Ge L, Guo Y, Zhao A, Yao J, Wang Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16503.

PMID: 39080346 PMC: 11289262. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67145-z.


References
1.
Harvey J, Clark G, Osborne C, Allred D . Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(5):1474-81. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1474. View

2.
Gutman S . Regulatory issues in tumor marker development. Semin Oncol. 2002; 29(3):294-300. DOI: 10.1053/sonc.2002.33140. View

3.
Mohsin S, Weiss H, Havighurst T, Clark G, Berardo M, Roanh L . Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in breast cancer: a validation study. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17(12):1545-54. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800229. View

4.
Badve S, Baehner F, Gray R, Childs B, Maddala T, Liu M . Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(15):2473-81. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6424. View

5.
Regan M, Viale G, Mastropasqua M, Maiorano E, Golouh R, Carbone A . Re-evaluating adjuvant breast cancer trials: assessing hormone receptor status by immunohistochemical versus extraction assays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006; 98(21):1571-81. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj415. View