» Articles » PMID: 38198519

Systems Approach for Congruence and Selection of Cancer Models Towards Precision Medicine

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Jan 10
PMID 38198519
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer models are instrumental as a substitute for human studies and to expedite basic, translational, and clinical cancer research. For a given cancer type, a wide selection of models, such as cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, organoids and genetically modified murine models, are often available to researchers. However, how to quantify their congruence to human tumors and to select the most appropriate cancer model is a largely unsolved issue. Here, we present Congruence Analysis and Selection of CAncer Models (CASCAM), a statistical and machine learning framework for authenticating and selecting the most representative cancer models in a pathway-specific manner using transcriptomic data. CASCAM provides harmonization between human tumor and cancer model omics data, systematic congruence quantification, and pathway-based topological visualization to determine the most appropriate cancer model selection. The systems approach is presented using invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) subtype and suggesting CAMA1 followed by UACC3133 as the most representative cell lines for ILC research. Two additional case studies for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and patient-derived xenograft/organoid (PDX/PDO) are further investigated. CASCAM is generalizable to any cancer subtype and will authenticate cancer models for faithful non-human preclinical research towards precision medicine.

Citing Articles

Cell-intrinsic platinum response and associated genetic and gene expression signatures in ovarian cancer cell lines and isogenic models.

Adams K, Wendt J, Wood J, Olson S, Moreno R, Jin Z bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131380 PMC: 11312449. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.26.605381.


The Transformative Role of 3D Culture Models in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Research.

Bittman-Soto X, Thomas E, Ganshert M, Mendez-Santacruz L, Harrell J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38791938 PMC: 11119918. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101859.

References
1.
Liu K, Newbury P, Glicksberg B, Zeng W, Paithankar S, Andrechek E . Evaluating cell lines as models for metastatic breast cancer through integrative analysis of genomic data. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):2138. PMC: 6520398. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10148-6. View

2.
Rahman M, Jackson L, Johnson W, Li D, Bild A, Piccolo S . Alternative preprocessing of RNA-Sequencing data in The Cancer Genome Atlas leads to improved analysis results. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(22):3666-72. PMC: 4804769. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv377. View

3.
Domcke S, Sinha R, Levine D, Sander C, Schultz N . Evaluating cell lines as tumour models by comparison of genomic profiles. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2126. PMC: 3715866. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3126. View

4.
Kim J, Koo B, Knoblich J . Human organoids: model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020; 21(10):571-584. PMC: 7339799. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-0259-3. View

5.
Najgebauer H, Yang M, Francies H, Pacini C, Stronach E, Garnett M . CELLector: Genomics-Guided Selection of Cancer In Vitro Models. Cell Syst. 2020; 10(5):424-432.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.04.007. View