» Articles » PMID: 38197644

Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Genome Evolutionary Patterns

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Jan 10
PMID 38197644
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spread of SARS-CoV-2 virus accompanied by public availability of abundant sequence data provides a window for the determination of viral evolutionary patterns. In this study, SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences were collected from seven countries in the period January 2020-December 2022. The sequences were classified into three phases, namely, pre-vaccination, post-vaccination, and recent period. Comparison was performed between these phases based on parameters like mutation rates, selection pressure (d/d ratio), and transition to transversion ratios (T/T). Similar comparisons were performed among SARS-CoV-2 variants. Statistical significance was tested using Graphpad unpaired -test. The analysis showed an increase in the percent genomic mutation rates post-vaccination and in recent periods across all countries from the pre-vaccination sequences. Mutation rates were highest in NSP3, S, N, and NSP12b before and increased further after vaccination. NSP4 showed the largest change in mutation rates after vaccination. The d/d ratios showed purifying selection that shifted toward neutral selection after vaccination. N, ORF8, ORF3a, and ORF10 were under highest positive selection before vaccination. Shift toward neutral selection was driven by E, NSP3, and ORF7a in the after vaccination set. In recent sequences, the largest d/d change was observed in E, NSP1, and NSP13. The T/T ratios decreased with time. C→U and G→U were the most frequent transitions and transversions. However, U→G was the most frequent transversion in recent period. The Omicron variant had the highest genomic mutation rates, while Delta showed the highest d/d ratio. Protein-wise d/d ratio was also seen to vary across the different variants.IMPORTANCETo the best of our knowledge, there exists no other large-scale study of the genomic and protein-wise mutation patterns during the time course of evolution in different countries. Analyzing the SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary patterns in view of the varying spatial, temporal, and biological signals is important for diagnostics, therapeutics, and pharmacovigilance of SARS-CoV-2.

Citing Articles

Virus Evolution in Prolonged Infections of Immunocompromised Individuals.

Raglow Z, Lauring A Clin Chem. 2025; 71(1):109-118.

PMID: 39749520 PMC: 11822857. DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvae150.


Mutational dynamics of SARS-CoV-2: Impact on future COVID-19 vaccine strategies.

Faraji N, Zeinali T, Joukar F, Aleali M, Eslami N, Shenagari M Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e30208.

PMID: 38707429 PMC: 11066641. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30208.


On the SARS-CoV-2 Variants.

Scarpa F, Branda F, Petrosillo N, Ciccozzi M Infect Dis Rep. 2024; 16(2):289-297.

PMID: 38667750 PMC: 11050187. DOI: 10.3390/idr16020024.

References
1.
Wang R, Chen J, Hozumi Y, Yin C, Wei G . Emerging Vaccine-Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Variants. ACS Infect Dis. 2022; 8(3):546-556. PMC: 8848511. DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00557. View

2.
Pathan R, Biswas M, Khandaker M . Time series prediction of COVID-19 by mutation rate analysis using recurrent neural network-based LSTM model. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020; 138:110018. PMC: 7293453. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110018. View

3.
Schubert K, Karousis E, Jomaa A, Scaiola A, Echeverria B, Gurzeler L . SARS-CoV-2 Nsp1 binds the ribosomal mRNA channel to inhibit translation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2020; 27(10):959-966. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-020-0511-8. View

4.
Mercatelli D, Triboli L, Fornasari E, Ray F, Giorgi F . Coronapp: A web application to annotate and monitor SARS-CoV-2 mutations. J Med Virol. 2020; 93(5):3238-3245. PMC: 7753722. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26678. View

5.
Ortega M, Garcia-Montero C, Fraile-Martinez O, Colet P, Baizhaxynova A, Mukhtarova K . Recapping the Features of SARS-CoV-2 and Its Main Variants: Status and Future Paths. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(6). PMC: 9225183. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060995. View