» Articles » PMID: 38193047

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Treatment at Extremes of Body Weight, Renal and Liver Function: an Illustrated Review

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2024 Jan 9
PMID 38193047
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been a welcome addition to clinical practice due to the practical advantages they confer over traditional anticoagulants. In many countries, DOACs are now used as first-line treatment for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Traditional anticoagulants allow for a degree of individualization, either through monitoring the international normalized ratio in the case of vitamin-K antagonists or through dose titration according to bodyweight in the case of low-molecular-weight heparin. However, the use of fixed doses and removal of the need for routine monitoring has created uncertainty in prescribing DOACs for patients at the extremes of bodyweight, renal function, and patients with liver impairment, who were not well represented in the DOAC licensing clinical trials. The discipline of pharmacokinetics is concerned with the movement of drugs through the body. Although the extremes of bodyweight and renal and liver function will influence the pharmacokinetics of DOACs, are these changes significant enough to affect clinical outcomes of bleeding and thrombosis? In other words, can the fixed-dosing strategy of DOACs accommodate these differences in physiology? In this review, we recap key pharmacokinetic principles for drug dosing; review venous thromboembolism trial and real-world data on patients prescribed DOACs at the extremes of bodyweight, renal function, and liver function; relate this to the pharmacokinetic properties of DOACs; and summarize the state of the field and current unknowns.

Citing Articles

Challenges to Laboratory Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Qiao J, Tran M Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024; 30:10760296241241524.

PMID: 38650302 PMC: 11036927. DOI: 10.1177/10760296241241524.

References
1.
Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar A, Mismetti P, Schellong S, Eriksson H . Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(24):2342-52. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906598. View

2.
Frost C, Ly V, Garonzik S . Apixaban Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Subjects with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment. Drugs R D. 2021; 21(4):375-384. PMC: 8602549. DOI: 10.1007/s40268-021-00359-y. View

3.
Stangier J, Clemens A . Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of dabigatran etexilate, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2009; 15 Suppl 1:9S-16S. DOI: 10.1177/1076029609343004. View

4.
Gosselin R, Adcock D, Bates S, Douxfils J, Favaloro E, Gouin-Thibault I . International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Recommendations for Laboratory Measurement of Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Thromb Haemost. 2018; 118(3):437-450. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1627480. View

5.
Hill N, Fatoba S, Oke J, Hirst J, OCallaghan C, Lasserson D . Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0158765. PMC: 4934905. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765. View