» Articles » PMID: 38188218

Evaluation of Response to Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy Using Positron Emission Computed Tomography for Metastatic Bladder Cancer

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jan 8
PMID 38188218
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to examine retrospectively the contribution of Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) to the evaluation of response to first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic bladder cancer.

Aim: To evaluate the response to Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin -based chemotherapy using FDG-PET/CT imaging in patients with metastatic bladder cancer.

Methods: Between July 2007 and April 2019, 79 patients underwent FDG-PET/CT imaging with the diagnosis of Metastatic Bladder Carcinoma (M-BCa). A total of 42 patients (38 male, 4 female) were included in the study, and all had been administered Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. After completion of the therapy, the patients underwent a repeat FDG-PET/CT scan and the results were compared with the PET/CT findings before chemotherapy according to European Organisation for the Research and treatment of cancer criteria. Mean age was 66.1 years and standard deviation was 10.7 years (range: 41-84 years).

Results: Of the patients, seven (16.6%) were in complete remission, 17 (40.5%) were in partial remission, six (14.3%) had a stable disease, and 12 (28.6%) had a progressive disease. The overall response rate was 57.1 percent.

Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT can be considered as a successful imaging tool in evaluating response to first-line chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer. Anatomical and functional data obtained from PET/CT scans may be useful in the planning of secondline and thirdline chemotherapy.

References
1.
Ploeg M, Aben K, Kiemeney L . The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world. World J Urol. 2009; 27(3):289-93. PMC: 2694323. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-009-0383-3. View

2.
Seo Y, Kim S, Kim H, Kim C, Park S, Koh E . Complete response to FOLFOX4 therapy in a patient with advanced urothelial cancer: a case report. J Hematol Oncol. 2010; 3:4. PMC: 2818621. DOI: 10.1186/1756-8722-3-4. View

3.
Abdollah F, Gandaglia G, Thuret R, Schmitges J, Tian Z, Jeldres C . Incidence, survival and mortality rates of stage-specific bladder cancer in United States: a trend analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013; 37(3):219-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.02.002. View

4.
Rosenberg J, Carroll P, Small E . Update on chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer. J Urol. 2005; 174(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000162039.38023.5f. View

5.
Heidenreich A, Albers P, Classen J, Graefen M, Gschwend J, Kotzerke J . Imaging studies in metastatic urogenital cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy: recommendations of a multidisciplinary consensus meeting of the Association of Urological Oncology of the German Cancer Society. Urol Int. 2010; 85(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1159/000318985. View