Clinical Value of Fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography in Bladder Cancer
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has been approved for imaging in many malignancies but not for bladder cancer. This study investigated the value of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of patients with advanced bladder cancer.
Patients And Methods: Between May 2006 and February 2008, 57 patients with bladder cancer at our center underwent FDG-PET/CT after CT (n = 52) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 5). The accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was assessed using both organ-based and patient-based analyses. FDG-PET/CT findings were validated by either biopsy or serial CT/MRI. Clinician questionnaires performed before and after FDG-PET/CT assessed whether those scan results affected management.
Results: One hundred thirty-five individual lesions were evaluable in 47 patients for the organ-based analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI, 76% to 94%) and 88% (95% CI, 78% to 95%), respectively. In the patient-based analysis, malignant disease was correctly diagnosed in 25 of 31 patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI, 63% to 93%). FDG-PET/CT was negative in 15 of 16 patients without malignant lesions for a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 71% to 100%). Pre- and post-PET surveys revealed that FDG-PET/CT detected more malignant disease than conventional CT/MRI in 40% of patients. Post-PET surveys showed that clinicians changed their planned management in 68% of patients based on the FDG-PET/CT results.
Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT has excellent sensitivity and specificity in the detection of metastatic bladder cancer and provides additional diagnostic information that enhances clinical management more than CT/MRI alone. FDG-PET/CT scans may provide better accuracy in clinical information for directing therapy.
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging in Urothelial Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.
McDonald S, Keane K, Gauci R, Hayne D Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).
PMID: 39858014 PMC: 11763387. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020232.
Shimamoto T, Karashima T, Nogami M, Inoue K, Yamagami T Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e68160.
PMID: 39350853 PMC: 11440008. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68160.
A narrative review of advances in the management of urothelial cancer: Diagnostics and treatments.
Wu S, Xiong S, Li J, Hong G, Xie Y, Tang Q Bladder (San Franc). 2024; 11(1):e21200003.
PMID: 39308962 PMC: 11413229. DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0003.
Einerhand S, Voskuilen C, van de Putte E, Donswijk M, Bruining A, van der Heijden M Bladder Cancer. 2024; 9(1):49-57.
PMID: 38994487 PMC: 11181845. DOI: 10.3233/BLC-220036.
Gulbahar Ates S, Demirel B, Basar H, Ucmak G Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2024; 33(1):11-18.
PMID: 38390706 PMC: 10899737. DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2023.65002.