» Articles » PMID: 20679618

Clinical Value of Fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography in Bladder Cancer

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Aug 4
PMID 20679618
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has been approved for imaging in many malignancies but not for bladder cancer. This study investigated the value of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of patients with advanced bladder cancer.

Patients And Methods: Between May 2006 and February 2008, 57 patients with bladder cancer at our center underwent FDG-PET/CT after CT (n = 52) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 5). The accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was assessed using both organ-based and patient-based analyses. FDG-PET/CT findings were validated by either biopsy or serial CT/MRI. Clinician questionnaires performed before and after FDG-PET/CT assessed whether those scan results affected management.

Results: One hundred thirty-five individual lesions were evaluable in 47 patients for the organ-based analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI, 76% to 94%) and 88% (95% CI, 78% to 95%), respectively. In the patient-based analysis, malignant disease was correctly diagnosed in 25 of 31 patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI, 63% to 93%). FDG-PET/CT was negative in 15 of 16 patients without malignant lesions for a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 71% to 100%). Pre- and post-PET surveys revealed that FDG-PET/CT detected more malignant disease than conventional CT/MRI in 40% of patients. Post-PET surveys showed that clinicians changed their planned management in 68% of patients based on the FDG-PET/CT results.

Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT has excellent sensitivity and specificity in the detection of metastatic bladder cancer and provides additional diagnostic information that enhances clinical management more than CT/MRI alone. FDG-PET/CT scans may provide better accuracy in clinical information for directing therapy.

Citing Articles

Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging in Urothelial Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.

McDonald S, Keane K, Gauci R, Hayne D Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39858014 PMC: 11763387. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020232.


Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement of Diuretic 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Cancer.

Shimamoto T, Karashima T, Nogami M, Inoue K, Yamagami T Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e68160.

PMID: 39350853 PMC: 11440008. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68160.


A narrative review of advances in the management of urothelial cancer: Diagnostics and treatments.

Wu S, Xiong S, Li J, Hong G, Xie Y, Tang Q Bladder (San Franc). 2024; 11(1):e21200003.

PMID: 39308962 PMC: 11413229. DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0003.


Prospective Evaluation of FDG-PET/CT for On-treatment Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant or Induction Chemotherapy in Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Einerhand S, Voskuilen C, van de Putte E, Donswijk M, Bruining A, van der Heijden M Bladder Cancer. 2024; 9(1):49-57.

PMID: 38994487 PMC: 11181845. DOI: 10.3233/BLC-220036.


The Added-value of Staging F-FDG PET/CT in the Prediction of Overall Survival in the Patients with Bladder Cancer.

Gulbahar Ates S, Demirel B, Basar H, Ucmak G Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2024; 33(1):11-18.

PMID: 38390706 PMC: 10899737. DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2023.65002.


References
1.
Kosuda S, Kison P, Greenough R, Grossman H, Wahl R . Preliminary assessment of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with bladder cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997; 24(6):615-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00841398. View

2.
Kibel A, Dehdashti F, Katz M, Klim A, Grubb R, Humphrey P . Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(26):4314-20. PMC: 4035361. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6722. View

3.
Paik M, Scolieri M, Brown S, Spirnak J, Resnick M . Limitations of computerized tomography in staging invasive bladder cancer before radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2000; 163(6):1693-6. View

4.
Hoekstra C, Stroobants S, Smit E, Vansteenkiste J, van Tinteren H, Postmus P . Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(33):8362-70. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.1189. View

5.
Swinnen G, Maes A, Pottel H, Vanneste A, Billiet I, Lesage K . FDG-PET/CT for the preoperative lymph node staging of invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2009; 57(4):641-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.014. View