» Articles » PMID: 38187592

Associations Between Music and Dance Relationships, Rhythmic Proficiency, and Spatiotemporal Movement Modulation Ability in Adults with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 Jan 8
PMID 38187592
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Personalized dance-based movement therapies may improve cognitive and motor function in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to Alzheimer's disease. While age- and MCI-related deficits reduce individuals' abilities to perform dance-like rhythmic movement sequences (RMS)-spatial and temporal modifications to movement-it remains unclear how individuals' relationships to dance and music affect their ability to perform RMS.

Objective: Characterize associations between RMS performance and music or dance relationships, as well as the ability to perceive rhythm and meter (rhythmic proficiency) in adults with and without MCI.

Methods: We used wearable inertial sensors to evaluate the ability of 12 young adults (YA; age=23.9±4.2 yrs; 9F), 26 older adults without MCI (OA; age=68.1±8.5 yrs; 16F), and 18 adults with MCI (MCI; age=70.8±6.2 yrs; 10F) to accurately perform spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal RMS. To quantify self-reported music and dance relationships and rhythmic proficiency, we developed Music (MRQ) and Dance Relationship Questionnaires (DRQ), and a rhythm assessment (RA), respectively. We correlated MRQ, DRQ, and RA scores against RMS performance for each group separately.

Results: The OA and YA groups exhibited better MRQ and RA scores than the MCI group (p<0.006). Better MRQ and RA scores were associated with better temporal RMS performance for only the YA and OA groups (r=0.18-0.41; p<0.045). DRQ scores were not associated with RMS performance in any group.

Conclusions: Cognitive deficits in adults with MCI likely limit the extent to which music relationships or rhythmic proficiency improve the ability to perform temporal aspects of movements performed during dance-based therapies.

References
1.
Mancini M, Horak F . Potential of APDM mobility lab for the monitoring of the progression of Parkinson's disease. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016; 13(5):455-62. PMC: 4959602. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2016.1153421. View

2.
Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, Petersen R, Ritchie K, Broich K . Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet. 2006; 367(9518):1262-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68542-5. View

3.
Zatorre R, Chen J, Penhune V . When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007; 8(7):547-58. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2152. View

4.
Bowie C, Harvey P . Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nat Protoc. 2007; 1(5):2277-81. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.390. View

5.
Guadagnoli M, Lee T . Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004; 36(2):212-24. DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224. View