» Articles » PMID: 38166637

Computational Application of Internationally Harmonized Defined Approaches to Skin Sensitization: DASS App

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Jan 3
PMID 38166637
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chemically induced skin sensitization, or allergic contact dermatitis, is a common occupational and public health issue. Regulatory authorities require an assessment of potential to cause skin sensitization for many chemical products. Defined approaches for skin sensitization (DASS) identify potential chemical skin sensitizers by integrating data from multiple non-animal tests based on human cells, molecular targets, and computational model predictions using standardized data interpretation procedures. While several DASS are internationally accepted by regulatory agencies, the data interpretation procedures vary in logical complexity, and manual application can be time-consuming or prone to error.

Results: We developed the DASS App, an open-source web application, to facilitate user application of three regulatory testing strategies for skin sensitization assessment: the Two-out-of-Three (2o3), the Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS), and the Key Event 3/1 Sequential Testing Strategy (KE 3/1 STS) without the need for software downloads or computational expertise. The application supports upload and analysis of user-provided data, includes steps to identify inconsistencies and formatting issues, and provides predictions in a downloadable format.

Conclusion: This open-access web-based implementation of internationally harmonized regulatory guidelines for an important public health endpoint is designed to support broad user uptake and consistent, reproducible application. The DASS App is freely accessible via https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/952311 and all scripts are available on GitHub ( https://github.com/NIEHS/DASS ).

Citing Articles

An Integrated Testing Strategy and Online Tool for Assessing Skin Sensitization of Agrochemical Formulations.

Kan H, Wang S, Liao C, Tsai W, Wang C, Tung C Toxics. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39771151 PMC: 11728478. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12120936.


A Novel Machine Learning Model and a Web Portal for Predicting the Human Skin Sensitization Effects of Chemical Agents.

Tieghi R, Moreira-Filho J, Martin H, Wellnitz J, Otoch M, Rath M Toxics. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39590983 PMC: 11598222. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12110803.

References
1.
Ankley G, Bennett R, Erickson R, Hoff D, Hornung M, Johnson R . Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010; 29(3):730-41. DOI: 10.1002/etc.34. View

2.
Daniel A, Choksi N, Abedini J, Bell S, Ceger P, Cook B . Data curation to support toxicity assessments using the Integrated Chemical Environment. Front Toxicol. 2022; 4:987848. PMC: 9669273. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2022.987848. View

3.
Canipa S, Chilton M, Hemingway R, Macmillan D, Myden A, Plante J . A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces. J Appl Toxicol. 2017; 37(8):985-995. DOI: 10.1002/jat.3448. View

4.
Nukada Y, Miyazawa M, Kazutoshi S, Sakaguchi H, Nishiyama N . Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro. 2012; 27(2):609-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.11.006. View

5.
Bauch C, Kolle S, Ramirez T, Eltze T, Fabian E, Mehling A . Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012; 63(3):489-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.013. View