» Articles » PMID: 38162892

Fusion of Dual Modalities of Non-invasive Sensory Feedback for Object Profiling with Prosthetic Hands

Overview
Date 2024 Jan 1
PMID 38162892
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Either non-invasive somatotopic or substitute sensory feedback is capable of conveying a single modality of sensory information from prosthetic hands to amputees. However, the neurocognitive ability of amputees to integrate multi-modality sensory information for functional discrimination is unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the fusion of non-invasive somatotopic tactile and substitute aperture feedbacks for profile perception of multiple physical features during grasping objects.

Methods: Two left transradial amputees with somatotopic evoked tactile sensation (ETS) of five fingers participated in the study. The tactile information of prosthetic hand was provided to amputees by the ETS feedback elicited on the stump projected finger map. Hand aperture information was conveyed to amputees with substitute electrotactile stimulation on the forearm or upper arm. Two types of sensory feedback were integrated to a commercial prosthetic hand. The efficacy of somatotopic ETS feedback on object length identification task was assessed with or without substitute aperture stimulation. The object size identification task was utilized to assess how ETS stimulation at the stump may affect aperture perception with stimulation on the ipsilateral upper arm or forearm. Finally, the task of identifying combined length and size was conducted to evaluate the ability of amputees to integrate the dual modalities of sensory feedback for perceiving profile features.

Results: The study revealed that amputee subjects can effectively integrate the ETS feedback with electrotactile substitutive feedback for object profile discrimination. Specifically, ETS was robust to provide object length information with electrotactile stimulation at either the forearm or upper arm. However, electrotactile stimulation at the upper arm for aperture perception was less susceptible to the interference of ETS stimulation than at the forearm.

Discussion: Amputee subjects are able to combine somatotopic ETS and aperture feedbacks for identifying multi-dimensional features in object profiling. The two sensory streams of information can be fused effectively without mutual interference for functional discrimination.

Citing Articles

xDev: a mixed-signal, software-defined neurotechnology interface platform for accelerated system development.

Parker S, Lee X, Calvert J, Borton D J Neural Eng. 2025; 22(2).

PMID: 40066693 PMC: 11894552. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/adb7bf.

References
1.
Hao M, Chou C, Zhang J, Yang F, Cao C, Yin P . Restoring Finger-Specific Sensory Feedback for Transradial Amputees via Non-Invasive Evoked Tactile Sensation. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2022; 1:98-107. PMC: 8979634. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2020.2981566. View

2.
Horch K, Meek S, Taylor T, Hutchinson D . Object discrimination with an artificial hand using electrical stimulation of peripheral tactile and proprioceptive pathways with intrafascicular electrodes. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011; 19(5):483-9. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2162635. View

3.
Proske U, Gandevia S . The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012; 92(4):1651-97. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2011. View

4.
Valle G, DAnna E, Strauss I, Clemente F, Granata G, Di Iorio R . Hand Control With Invasive Feedback Is Not Impaired by Increased Cognitive Load. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:287. PMC: 7147827. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00287. View

5.
Bensmaia S, Tyler D, Micera S . Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020; 7(4):443-455. PMC: 10233657. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-00630-8. View