» Articles » PMID: 34516746

Neurorobotic Fusion of Prosthetic Touch, Kinesthesia, and Movement in Bionic Upper Limbs Promotes Intrinsic Brain Behaviors

Overview
Journal Sci Robot
Date 2021 Sep 13
PMID 34516746
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bionic prostheses have restorative potential. However, the complex interplay between intuitive motor control, proprioception, and touch that represents the hallmark of human upper limb function has not been revealed. Here, we show that the neurorobotic fusion of touch, grip kinesthesia, and intuitive motor control promotes levels of behavioral performance that are stratified toward able-bodied function and away from standard-of-care prosthetic users. This was achieved through targeted motor and sensory reinnervation, a closed-loop neural-machine interface, coupled to a noninvasive robotic architecture. Adding touch to motor control improves the ability to reach intended target grasp forces, find target durometers among distractors, and promote prosthetic ownership. Touch, kinesthesia, and motor control restore balanced decision strategies when identifying target durometers and intrinsic visuomotor behaviors that reduce the need to watch the prosthetic hand during object interactions, which frees the eyes to look ahead to the next planned action. The combination of these three modalities also enhances error correction performance. We applied our unified theoretical, functional, and clinical analyses, enabling us to define the relative contributions of the sensory and motor modalities operating simultaneously in this neural-machine interface. This multiperspective framework provides the necessary evidence to show that bionic prostheses attain more human-like function with effective sensory-motor restoration.

Citing Articles

Exploring the impact of myoelectric prosthesis controllers on visuomotor behavior.

Cheng K, Williams H, Shehata A, Pilarski P, Chapman C, Hebert J J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):57.

PMID: 40075405 PMC: 11900612. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01604-0.


Examining the physical and psychological effects of combining multimodal feedback with continuous control in prosthetic hands.

Chappell D, Yang Z, Clark A, Berkovic A, Laganier C, Baxter W Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3690.

PMID: 39880874 PMC: 11779825. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87048-x.


Application of EMG feedback for hand prosthesis control in high-level amputation: a case study.

Tchimino J, Hansen R, Jorgensen P, Dideriksen J, Dosen S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31676.

PMID: 39738285 PMC: 11685611. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80828-x.


Restoration of natural somatic sensations to the amputees: finding the right combination of neurostimulation methods.

Soghoyan G, Biktimirov A, Piliugin N, Matvienko Y, Kaplan A, Sintsov M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1466684.

PMID: 39654645 PMC: 11626906. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1466684.


Creation of a biological sensorimotor interface for bionic reconstruction.

Festin C, Ortmayr J, Maierhofer U, Tereshenko V, Blumer R, Schmoll M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5337.

PMID: 38914540 PMC: 11196281. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49580-8.