» Articles » PMID: 38162830

A Matched-pair Case Control Study Identifying Hemodynamic Predictors of Cerebral Aneurysm Growth Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2024 Jan 1
PMID 38162830
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Initiation and progression of cerebral aneurysms is known to be driven by complex interactions between biological and hemodynamic factors, but the hemodynamic mechanism which drives aneurysm growth is unclear. We employed robust modeling and computational methods, including temporal and spatial convergence studies, to study hemodynamic characteristics of cerebral aneurysms and identify differences in these characteristics between growing and stable aneurysms. Eleven pairs of growing and non-growing cerebral aneurysms, matched in both size and location, were modeled from MRA and CTA images, then simulated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Key hemodynamic characteristics, including wall shear stress (WSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and portion of the aneurysm under low shear, were evaluated. Statistical analysis was then performed using paired Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The portion of the aneurysm dome under 70% of the parent artery mean wall shear stress was higher in growing aneurysms than in stable aneurysms and had the highest significance among the tested metrics ( = 0.08). Other metrics of area under low shear had similar levels of significance. These results align with previously observed hemodynamic trends in cerebral aneurysms, indicating a promising direction for future study of low shear area and aneurysm growth. We also found that mesh resolution significantly affected simulated WSS in cerebral aneurysms. This establishes that robust computational modeling methods are necessary for high fidelity results. Together, this work demonstrates that complex hemodynamics are at play within cerebral aneurysms, and robust modeling and simulation methods are needed to further study this topic.

References
1.
Dempere-Marco L, Oubel E, Castro M, Putman C, Frangi A, Cebral J . CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007; 9(Pt 2):438-45. DOI: 10.1007/11866763_54. View

2.
Kobayashi N, Karino T . Flow patterns and velocity distributions in the human vertebrobasilar arterial system. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg. 2010; 113(4):810-9. DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS09575. View

3.
Kono K, Fujimoto T, Shintani A, Terada T . Hemodynamic characteristics at the rupture site of cerebral aneurysms: a case study. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71(6):E1202-8. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826f7ede. View

4.
Xiang J, Tremmel M, Kolega J, Levy E, Natarajan S, Meng H . Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011; 4(5):351-7. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010089. View

5.
Chung B, Mut F, Putman C, Hamzei-Sichani F, Brinjikji W, Kallmes D . Identification of Hostile Hemodynamics and Geometries of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Case-Control Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018; 39(10):1860-1866. PMC: 6177283. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5764. View