» Articles » PMID: 38161685

Acceptability and Use of an Online Health Priorities Self-identification Tool for Older Adults: A Qualitative Investigation

Overview
Journal PEC Innov
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Jan 1
PMID 38161685
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the use of a web-based, self-directed health priorities identification tool for older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs).

Methods: We recruited a gender- and racially-diverse, highly educated sample of older adults with MCCs to engage with our My Health Priorities tool, then complete a semi-structured interview. Thematic analysis was used to examine interview transcripts.

Results: Twenty-one participants shared perspectives on the acceptability and use of the tool. Three themes (with eleven subthemes) were generated to describe: website , the , and the tool's

Conclusion: Participants found this tool acceptable and easy to use, describing a variety of benefits of the priorities self-identification process and offered suggestions for refinement and broader implementation. Older adults with limited internet navigation abilities or misconceptions about the self-directed process may benefit from clinicians clarifying the purpose of the process or initiating priorities-aligned discussions.

Innovation: This novel tool can help older adults with MCCs define what matters most for their health and healthcare, informing a variety of health decisions. This tool may enable and motivate patients to lead health priorities decision-making discussions with clinicians and care partners.

Citing Articles

Leveraging an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Help Patients Formulate Their Health Care Goals: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Pilot Interventions.

Naimark J, Tinetti M, Delbanco T, Dong Z, Harcourt K, Esterson J JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e56332.

PMID: 39207829 PMC: 11393498. DOI: 10.2196/56332.


Clinicians' perceptions of care partner involvement in health priorities identification for people living with dementia.

Monin J, Mroz E, Bonds Johnson K, Samper-Ternent R, Vu T, Tinetti M J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024; 72(8):2604-2606.

PMID: 38709115 PMC: 11323148. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18937.

References
1.
Kozlov E, McDarby M, Duberstein P, Carpenter B . The Feasibility and Acceptability of an Intergenerational, Web-Based Intervention to Enhance Later-Life Family Care Planning. Gerontologist. 2020; 61(7):1153-1163. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa137. View

2.
Norris S, High K, Gill T, Hennessy S, Kutner J, Reuben D . Health care for older Americans with multiple chronic conditions: a research agenda. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 56(1):149-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01530.x. View

3.
Tinetti M, Naik A, Dindo L, Costello D, Esterson J, Geda M . Association of Patient Priorities-Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019; 179(12):1688-1697. PMC: 6784811. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235. View

4.
Fried T, McGraw S, Agostini J, Tinetti M . Views of older persons with multiple morbidities on competing outcomes and clinical decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56(10):1839-44. PMC: 2596278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01923.x. View

5.
Brown T . Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev. 2008; 86(6):84-92, 141. View