» Articles » PMID: 30844080

Perspectives of Patients in Identifying Their Values-Based Health Priorities

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2019 Mar 8
PMID 30844080
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Patient Health Priorities Identification (PHPI) is a values-based process in which trained facilitators assist older adults with multiple chronic conditions identify their health priorities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' perceptions of PHPI.

Design: Qualitative study using thematic analysis.

Setting: In-depth semistructured telephone and in-person interviews.

Participants: Twenty-two older adults who participated in the PHPI process.

Measurements: Open-ended questions about patient perceptions of the PHPI process, perceived benefits of the process, enablers and barriers to PHPI, and recommendations for process enhancement.

Results: Patient interviews ranged from 9 to 63 minutes (median = 20 min; interquartile range = 15-26). The mean age was 80 years (standard deviation = 7.96), 64% were female, and all patients identified themselves as white. Of the sample, 73% reported no caregiver involvement in their healthcare; 36% lived alone. Most patients felt able to complete the PHPI process with ease. Perceived benefits included increased knowledge and insight into disease processes and treatment options, patient activation, and enhanced communication with family and clinicians. Patients identified several factors that were both enablers and barriers to PHPI including facilitator characteristics, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, social support, relationships between the patient and their primary care provider, and the changing health priorities of the patient. Recommendations for process enhancement included more frequent and flexible facilitator contacts, selection of patients for participation based on specific patient characteristics, clarification of process aims and expectations, involvement of family, written reminders of established health priorities, short duration between facilitation and primary care provider follow-up, and the inclusion of health-related tasks in facilitation visits.

Conclusions: Patients found the PHPI process valuable in identifying actionable health priorities and healthcare goals leading to enhanced knowledge, activation, and communication regarding their treatment options and preferences. PHPI may be useful for aligning the healthcare that patients receive with their values-based priorities.

Citing Articles

Perceived Connections Between Personal Values and Health in High-Risk Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.

Schuttner L, Staloff J, Theis M, Ralston J, Rosland A, Nelson K J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40038223 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09448-z.


Leveraging an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Help Patients Formulate Their Health Care Goals: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Pilot Interventions.

Naimark J, Tinetti M, Delbanco T, Dong Z, Harcourt K, Esterson J JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e56332.

PMID: 39207829 PMC: 11393498. DOI: 10.2196/56332.


Patient Priorities-Aligned Care for Older Adults With Multiple Conditions: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Tinetti M, Hashmi A, Ng H, Doyle M, Goto T, Esterson J JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(1):e2352666.

PMID: 38261319 PMC: 10807252. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52666.


Acceptability and use of an online health priorities self-identification tool for older adults: A qualitative investigation.

Mroz E, Hernandez-Bigos K, Esterson J, Kiwak E, Naik A, Tinetti M PEC Innov. 2024; 3:100242.

PMID: 38161685 PMC: 10757242. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100242.


Operationalizing the Chronic Care Model with Goal-Oriented Care.

Grudniewicz A, Gray C, Boeckxstaens P, De Maeseneer J, Mold J Patient. 2023; 16(6):569-578.

PMID: 37642918 PMC: 10570240. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00645-8.


References
1.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

2.
Brown V, Bartholomew L, Naik A . Management of chronic hypertension in older men: an exploration of patient goal-setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 69(1-3):93-9. PMC: 2860531. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.07.006. View

3.
Tinetti M, McAvay G, Fried T, Allore H, Salmon J, Foody J . Health outcome priorities among competing cardiovascular, fall injury, and medication-related symptom outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56(8):1409-16. PMC: 3494099. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01815.x. View

4.
Fried T, McGraw S, Agostini J, Tinetti M . Views of older persons with multiple morbidities on competing outcomes and clinical decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56(10):1839-44. PMC: 2596278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01923.x. View

5.
Fried T, Tinetti M, Iannone L, OLeary J, Towle V, Van Ness P . Health outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(20):1854-6. PMC: 4036681. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.424. View