» Articles » PMID: 38146139

Development and Validation of Models for Predicting Preterm Birth and Gestational Latency Following Emergency Cervical Cerclage: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2023 Dec 26
PMID 38146139
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Emergency cervical cerclage is a recognized method for preventing mid-trimester pregnancy loss and premature birth; however, its benefits remain controversial. This study aimed to establish preoperative models predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant patients with a high risk of preterm birth.

Material And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who received emergency cerclage between 2015 and 2023 in three institutions. Patients were grouped into a derivation cohort (n = 141) and an independent validation cohort (n = 61). Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent predictive variables and establish the models. Harrell's C-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses were performed to assess the models.

Results: The models incorporated gestational weeks at cerclage placement, history of prior second-trimester loss and/or preterm birth, cervical dilation, and preoperative C-reactive protein level. The C-index of the model for predicting preterm birth before 28 weeks was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93) in the derivation cohort and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.92) in the independent validation cohort; The C-index of the model for predicting gestational latency was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84), respectively. In the derivation set, the areas under the curves were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.84 for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-week pregnancy prolongation, respectively. The corresponding values for the external validation were 0.78, 0.78, and 0.79, respectively. Calibration curves showed a good homogeneity between the observed and predicted ongoing pregnant probabilities. Decision curve analyses revealed satisfactory clinical usefulness.

Conclusions: These novel models provide reliable and valuable prognostic predictions for patients undergoing emergency cerclage. The models can assist clinicians and patients in making personalized clinical decisions before opting for the cervical cerclage.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of models for predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage: A multicenter cohort study.

Chen C, Zhao B, Pan Y, Chen L, Yang X, Lv M Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023; 103(5):917-926.

PMID: 38146139 PMC: 11019517. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14758.

References
1.
Vickers A, Cronin A . Traditional statistical methods for evaluating prediction models are uninformative as to clinical value: towards a decision analytic framework. Semin Oncol. 2010; 37(1):31-8. PMC: 2857322. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.12.004. View

2.
Kokia E, Dor J, Blankenstein J, Seidman D, Lipitz S, SERR D . A simple scoring system for the treatment of cervical incompetence diagnosed during the second trimester. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991; 31(1):12-6. DOI: 10.1159/000293093. View

3.
Barinov S, Artymuk N, Novikova O, Shamina I, Tirskaya Y, Belinina A . Analysis of risk factors and predictors of pregnancy loss and strategies for the management of cervical insufficiency in pregnant women at a high risk of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 34(13):2071-2079. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1656195. View

4.
Althuisius S, Dekker G, Hummel P, Bekedam D, van Geijn H . Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185(5):1106-12. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.118655. View

5.
Owen J, Hankins G, Iams J, Berghella V, Sheffield J, Perez-Delboy A . Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201(4):375.e1-8. PMC: 2768604. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.015. View