» Articles » PMID: 38137906

Changes in the Bacterial Communities of Biocomposites with Different Flame Retardants

Overview
Journal Life (Basel)
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Dec 23
PMID 38137906
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In today's world, the use of environmentally friendly materials is strongly encouraged. These materials derive from primary raw materials of plant origin, like fibrous hemp, flax, and bamboo, or recycled materials, such as textiles or residual paper, making them suitable for the growth of microorganisms. Here, we investigate changes in bacterial communities in biocomposites made of hemp shives, corn starch, and either expandable graphite or a Flovan compound as flame retardants. Using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), we found that after 12 months of incubation at 22 °C with a relative humidity of 65%, Proteobacteria accounted for >99.7% of the microbiome in composites with either flame retardant. By contrast, in the absence of flame retardants, the abundance of Proteobacteria decreased to 32.1%, while Bacteroidetes (36.6%), Actinobacteria (8.4%), and Saccharobacteria (TM7, 14.51%) appeared. Using the increasing concentrations of either expandable graphite or a Flovan compound in an LB medium, we were able to achieve up to a 5-log reduction in the viability of , , representatives of the and genera, the abundance of which varied in the biocomposites tested. Our results demonstrate that flame retardants act on both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and suggest that their antimicrobial activities also have to be tested when producing new compounds.

Citing Articles

Trends in Microbiology 2024.

Rampelotto P, Kolar M Life (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39860005 PMC: 11766640. DOI: 10.3390/life15010065.

References
1.
Liu S, Zeng T, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R . Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano. 2011; 5(9):6971-80. DOI: 10.1021/nn202451x. View

2.
Mulcahy L, Isabella V, Lewis K . Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in disease. Microb Ecol. 2013; 68(1):1-12. PMC: 3977026. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-013-0297-x. View

3.
Taghinasab M, Jabaji S . Cannabis Microbiome and the Role of Endophytes in Modulating the Production of Secondary Metabolites: An Overview. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(3). PMC: 7143057. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8030355. View

4.
Auer L, Lazuka A, Sillam-Dusses D, Miambi E, ODonohue M, Hernandez-Raquet G . Uncovering the Potential of Termite Gut Microbiome for Lignocellulose Bioconversion in Anaerobic Batch Bioreactors. Front Microbiol. 2018; 8:2623. PMC: 5744482. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02623. View

5.
Su Y, Liu C, Fang H, Zhang D . Bacillus subtilis: a universal cell factory for industry, agriculture, biomaterials and medicine. Microb Cell Fact. 2020; 19(1):173. PMC: 7650271. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-020-01436-8. View