» Articles » PMID: 38131851

Haptic Nudging Using a Wearable Device to Promote Upper Limb Activity During Stroke Rehabilitation: Exploring Diurnal Variation, Repetition, and Duration of Effect

Overview
Date 2023 Dec 22
PMID 38131851
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Haptic nudging via wearable devices promotes physical activity and may increase upper limb movement in stroke rehabilitation. This study investigated the optimal approach to haptic nudging by examining diurnal variation, duration of effect, and repeated nudging. The study analysed data from a multiple-period randomised crossover study. A 12 h inpatient rehabilitation day was divided into 72 intervals in which participants with stroke (n = 20) randomly received either a 'nudge' or 'no nudge'. Upper limb movement was observed, classified, and analysed using longitudinal mixed models. The odds of affected upper limb movement following a nudge compared with no nudge were significantly higher during active periods such as breakfast, lunch, and morning and afternoon activities (odds ratios (ORs) 2.01-4.63, 95% CIs [1.27-2.67, 3.17-8.01]), but not dinner (OR 1.36, 95% CI [0.86, 2.16]). The effect of nudging was no longer statistically significant at 50-60 s post-nudge. Consecutive delays in nudging significantly decreased the odds of moving when a nudge was eventually delivered. Contrary to expectations, people with stroke appear more responsive to haptic nudging during active periods rather than periods of inactivity. By understanding the optimal timing and frequency of haptic nudging, the design of wearable devices can be optimised to maximise their therapeutic benefits.

Citing Articles

Encouraging arm use in stroke survivors: the impact of smart reminders during a home-based intervention.

Mayrhuber L, Andres S, Legrand M, Luft A, Ryser F, Gassert R J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):220.

PMID: 39707385 PMC: 11662716. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01527-2.


Utility and usability of a wearable system and progressive-challenge cued exercise program for encouraging use of the more involved arm at-home after stroke-a feasibility study with case reports.

Horder J, Mrotek L, Casadio M, Bassindale K, McGuire J, Scheidt R J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):66.

PMID: 38685012 PMC: 11059679. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01359-0.

References
1.
Johansson D, Malmgren K, Alt Murphy M . Wearable sensors for clinical applications in epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, and stroke: a mixed-methods systematic review. J Neurol. 2018; 265(8):1740-1752. PMC: 6060770. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-8786-y. View

2.
Laranjo L, Ding D, Heleno B, Kocaballi B, Quiroz J, Tong H . Do smartphone applications and activity trackers increase physical activity in adults? Systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression. Br J Sports Med. 2020; 55(8):422-432. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102892. View

3.
Da-Silva R, van Wijck F, Shaw L, Rodgers H, Balaam M, Brkic L . Prompting arm activity after stroke: A clinical proof of concept study of wrist-worn accelerometers with a vibrating alert function. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019; 5:2055668318761524. PMC: 6453063. DOI: 10.1177/2055668318761524. View

4.
Jiang Y, Qin Y, Kim I, Wang Y . Towards an IoT-based upper limb rehabilitation assessment system. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017; 2017:2414-2417. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037343. View

5.
McLaren R, Signal N, Lord S, Taylor S, Henderson J, Taylor D . The volume and timing of upper limb movement in acute stroke rehabilitation: still room for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 42(22):3237-3242. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1590471. View