» Articles » PMID: 31487812

An Exploration and Confirmation of the Factors Influencing Adoption of IoT-Based Wearable Fitness Trackers

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Sep 7
PMID 31487812
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, IoT (Internet of Things)-based smart devices have penetrated a wide range of markets, including connected health, smart home, and wearable devices. Among the IoT-based smart devices, wearable fitness trackers are the most widely diffused and adopted IoT based devices. Such devices can monitor or track the physical activity of the person wearing them. Although society has benefitted from the conveniences provided by IoT-based wearable fitness trackers, few studies have explored the factors influencing the adoption of such technology. Furthermore, one of the most prevalent issues nowadays is the large attrition rate of consumers no longer wearing their device. Consequently, this article aims to define an analytic framework that can be used to explore the factors that influence the adoption of IoT-based wearable fitness trackers. In this article, the constructs for evaluating these factors will be explored by reviewing extant studies and theories. Then, these constructs are further evaluated based on experts' consensus using the modified Delphi method. Based on the opinions of experts, the analytic framework for deriving an influence relationship map (IRM) is derived using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). Finally, based on the IRM, the behaviors adopted by mass customers toward IoT-based wearable fitness trackers are confirmed using the partial least squares (PLS) structural equation model (SEM) approach. The proposed analytic framework that integrates the DEMATEL and PLS-SEM was verified as being a feasible research area by empirical validation that was based on opinions provided by both Taiwanese experts and mass customers. The proposed analytic method can be used in future studies of technology marketing and consumer behaviors.

Citing Articles

Modelling the significance of value-belief-norm framework to predict mass adoption potentials of internet of things-enabled wearable fitness devices.

Yang Q, Al Mamun A, Reza M, Naznen F Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e30179.

PMID: 38737228 PMC: 11088247. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30179.


Iterative Patient Testing of a Stimuli-Responsive Swallowing Activity Sensor to Promote Extended User Engagement During the First Year After Radiation: Multiphase Remote and In-Person Observational Cohort Study.

Shinn E, Garden A, Peterson S, Leupi D, Chen M, Blau R JMIR Cancer. 2024; 10:e47359.

PMID: 38416544 PMC: 10938225. DOI: 10.2196/47359.


Haptic Nudging Using a Wearable Device to Promote Upper Limb Activity during Stroke Rehabilitation: Exploring Diurnal Variation, Repetition, and Duration of Effect.

Signal N, Olsen S, Rashid U, McLaren R, Vandal A, King M Behav Sci (Basel). 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38131851 PMC: 10740938. DOI: 10.3390/bs13120995.


Security Risks and User Perception towards Adopting Wearable Internet of Medical Things.

Thapa S, Bello A, Maurushat A, Farid F Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(8).

PMID: 37107800 PMC: 10139409. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20085519.


Technology Roadmap for Flexible Sensors.

Luo Y, Reza Abidian M, Ahn J, Akinwande D, Andrews A, Antonietti M ACS Nano. 2023; 17(6):5211-5295.

PMID: 36892156 PMC: 11223676. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c12606.


References
1.
Kim J, Park H . Development of a health information technology acceptance model using consumers' health behavior intention. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(5):e133. PMC: 3510715. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2143. View

2.
Maillet E, Mathieu L, Sicotte C . Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an Electronic Patient Record in acute care settings: an extension of the UTAUT. Int J Med Inform. 2014; 84(1):36-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.004. View

3.
Tavares J, Goulao A, Oliveira T . Electronic Health Record Portals adoption: Empirical model based on UTAUT2. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017; 43(2):109-125. DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2017.1363759. View