» Articles » PMID: 38129879

Maternal Disability and Initiation and Duration of Breastfeeding: Analysis of a Canadian Cross-sectional Survey

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Dec 22
PMID 38129879
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization recommends breastfeeding as the best method for infant feeding. Known risk factors for breastfeeding non-initiation and early cessation of breastfeeding are diverse and include low breastfeeding self-efficacy, poverty, smoking, obesity, and chronic illness. Although women with disabilities experience elevated rates of these risk factors, few studies have examined their breastfeeding outcomes. Our objective was to examine breastfeeding non-initiation and early cessation of breastfeeding in women with and without disabilities.

Methods: We used data from the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey. Included were n = 4,817 women aged 15-55 years who had a birth in the last five years, of whom 26.6% had a disability, ascertained using the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning. Prevalence ratios (aPR) of breastfeeding non-initiation, and of early cessation of any and exclusive breastfeeding before 6 months, were calculated for women with versus without disabilities. We also examined disability by severity (moderate/severe and mild, separately) and number of action domains impacted (≥ 2 and 1, separately). The main multivariable models were adjusted for maternal age, marital status, level of education, annual household income level, and immigrant status.

Results: There were no differences between women with and without disabilities in breastfeeding non-initiation (9.6% vs. 8.9%; aPR 0.88, 95% CI 0.63, 1.23). Women with disabilities were more likely to have early cessation of any (44.4% vs. 35.7%) and exclusive breastfeeding before 6 months (66.9% vs. 61.3%), with some attenuation in risk after adjustment for sociodemographic factors (aRR 1.15, 95% CI 0.99, 1.33 and aRR 1.07, 95% 0.98, 1.16, respectively). Disparities were larger for women with moderate/severe disabilities and disabilities in ≥ 2 domains, with differences attenuated by adjustment for socio-demographics.

Conclusions: Women with disabilities, and particularly those with moderate/severe and multiple disabilities, could benefit from tailored, accessible breastfeeding supports that attend to the social determinants of health.

References
1.
Spiesser-Robelet L, Brunie V, DE Andrade V, Gagnayre R . Knowledge, Representations, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Women Faced With Taking Medications While Breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 2016; 33(1):98-114. DOI: 10.1177/0890334416679383. View

2.
Levitt C, Hanvey L, Kaczorowski J, Chalmers B, Heaman M, Bartholomew S . Breastfeeding policies and practices in Canadian hospitals: comparing 1993 with 2007. Birth. 2011; 38(3):228-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00479.x. View

3.
. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(3):e827-41. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. View

4.
Dennis C . The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale: psychometric assessment of the short form. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003; 32(6):734-44. DOI: 10.1177/0884217503258459. View

5.
Segura-Perez S, Hromi-Fiedler A, Adnew M, Nyhan K, Perez-Escamilla R . Impact of breastfeeding interventions among United States minority women on breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2021; 20(1):72. PMC: 7936442. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01388-4. View