» Articles » PMID: 33676506

Impact of Breastfeeding Interventions Among United States Minority Women on Breastfeeding Outcomes: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Mar 7
PMID 33676506
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the U.S., strong ethnic/racial, socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic breastfeeding (BF) inequities persist, and African American and Hispanic women are less likely to meet their breastfeeding goals compared to White women. This systematic review (SR) was designed to answer the question: What is the impact of breastfeeding interventions targeting ethnic/racial minority women in the U.S. on improving BF initiation, duration and exclusivity rates?

Methods: The SR was conducted following the Institute of Medicine Guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The study protocol was developed and registered a priori in PROSPERO (ID#CRD42020177764). The electronical databases searched was MEDLINE All (Ovid). Search strategies were led by the team's expert public health librarian using both controlled vocabulary and free text queries and were tested against a validated set of relevant papers included in existing reviews. The GRADE methodology was used to assess the quality of the studies.

Results: We included 60 studies that had randomized (n = 25), observational (n = 24), quasi-experimental (n = 9), or cross-sectional (n = 2) designs. The studies focused on populations that were multi-ethnic/racial (n = 22), only Hispanic (n = 24), only Black (n = 13), and only American Indian (n = 1). The study interventions were classified following the socioecological model: macrosystem/policy level (n = 6); community level (n=51), which included healthcare organizations (n = 34), The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) (n = 9), and community organizations/public health institutions (n = 8); and  interpersonal level (n = 3).

Conclusions: Policy and community level interventions delivered through WIC, healthcare facilities, and community agencies) are likely to improve BF outcomes among women of color. The combination of interventions at different levels of the socioecological model has not been studied among minority women in the U.S. Implementation science research is needed to learn how best to scale up and sustain effective BF interventions, taking into account the needs and wants of minority women. Thus, it is strongly recommended  to conduct large scale implementation research studies addressesing how to strengthen the different health and social environments surrounding women of color in the U.S. to improving their BF outcomes.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Social Factors on the Benefits of Breastfeeding.

Savant U, Gustafson L, Sand E, McGoff T, Daneshvari Berry S J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025; .

PMID: 40088386 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-025-02382-0.


Implementation of a Language-Concordant, Culturally Tailored Inpatient Lactation Program.

Kalluri N, Padilla-Garza E, Kehoe T, Andrews C, Schantz-Dunn J, Riley J JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(3):e250274.

PMID: 40053351 PMC: 11889473. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0274.


Evaluating interdisciplinary breastfeeding and lactation knowledge, attitudes and skills: An evaluation of a professional graduate programme for healthcare professionals.

McGuinness D, Frazer K, Conyard K, Cornally P, Cooper L, Vickers N PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0310500.

PMID: 39888875 PMC: 11785295. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310500.


California provider and advocate perspectives about opportunities to optimize nutrition services and resources in the first 1000 days.

Lindsay K, Robertson T, Leka H, Rosales A, Smilowitz J, Lucas C Reprod Female Child Health. 2025; 3(2.

PMID: 39830426 PMC: 11741669. DOI: 10.1002/rfc2.93.


It Takes a Village: How Community-Based Peer Support for Breastfeeding Bolsters Lactation Prevalence Among Black Mississippians on the Gulf Coast.

Bartkowski J, Klee K, Xu X, Roach J, Jones S Pediatr Rep. 2024; 16(4):1064-1076.

PMID: 39585045 PMC: 11587441. DOI: 10.3390/pediatric16040091.


References
1.
Bunik M, Shobe P, OConnor M, Beaty B, Langendoerfer S, Crane L . Are 2 weeks of daily breastfeeding support insufficient to overcome the influences of formula?. Acad Pediatr. 2010; 10(1):21-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.09.014. View

2.
Lovera D, Sanderson M, Bogle M, Vela Acosta M . Evaluation of a breastfeeding peer support program for fathers of Hispanic participants in a Texas special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110(11):1696-702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.08.001. View

3.
Brown A . Among women planning to exclusively breastfeed, in-hospital formula supplementation is associated with almost tripled risk of breastfeeding cessation by 2 months. Evid Based Nurs. 2014; 18(3):68. DOI: 10.1136/eb-2014-101945. View

4.
Hans S, Edwards R, Zhang Y . Randomized Controlled Trial of Doula-Home-Visiting Services: Impact on Maternal and Infant Health. Matern Child Health J. 2018; 22(Suppl 1):105-113. PMC: 6153776. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-018-2537-7. View

5.
Scheinmann R, Chiasson M, Hartel D, Rosenberg T . Evaluating a bilingual video to improve infant feeding knowledge and behavior among immigrant Latina mothers. J Community Health. 2009; 35(5):464-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-009-9202-4. View