» Articles » PMID: 38129824

An Iterative Approach to Developing a Multifaceted Implementation Strategy for a Complex EHealth Intervention Within Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background: The number of complex eHealth interventions has increased considerably. Despite available implementation theory outlining well-designed strategies, implementing complex interventions within practice proves challenging and often does not lead to sustainable use. To improve sustainability, theory and practice should be addressed during the development of an implementation strategy. By subsequently transparently reporting the executed theory-based steps and their corresponding practice findings, others can learn from these valuable lessons learned. This study outlines the iterative approach by which a multifaceted implementation strategy for a complex eHealth intervention in clinical practice was developed, tested and refined.

Methods: We implemented the BENEFIT program, an advanced eHealth platform with Personal Health Portal facilitating healthy living in cardiac patients. In six iterative phases alternating between theory and practice, the implementation strategy was developed, tested and refined. The initial implementation strategy (phase 1) was drawn up using the Implementation model and RE-AIM. Subsequently, this strategy was further updated in brainstorming sessions and group discussions with twenty key stakeholders from three cardiac care centres and then evaluated in a pilot (phases 2 and 3).

Results: The pilot of the program led to the identification of (context-specific) key challenges in practice (phase 4), which were subsequently connected back to broader theory (phase 5) using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR). In the final phase, practice recommendations tackling the key challenges were formulated (phase 6) based on CFIR theory, the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool, and stakeholders' input and feedback. These recommendations were then added to the refined strategy. Thus, executing this approach led to the realisation and use of a multifaceted theory-informed practice-based implementation strategy.

Conclusion: This case study gives an in-depth description of an iterative approach to developing an evidence-based, practice-tailored strategy for implementing a complex eHealth intervention in cardiac care. As such, this study may serve as a blueprint for other researchers aspiring to implement complex eHealth interventions within clinical practice sustainably.

Citing Articles

Disruptions and adaptations of an urban nutrition intervention delivering essential services for women and children during a major health system crisis in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Escobar-DeMarco J, Nguyen P, Kundu G, Kabir R, Ali M, Ireen S Matern Child Nutr. 2024; 21(1):e13750.

PMID: 39526635 PMC: 11650038. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13750.


Protocol for leading health services innovation: a hybrid type 2 mixed method implementation trial for developing and assessing a codesigned graduate certificate program in health innovation.

Kosiol J, Avery M, Silvester T, Smyth M, Sanger G, Purdy J BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1256.

PMID: 39501304 PMC: 11536537. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06094-7.


User-Centered Design and Usability of Voxe as a Pediatric Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Platform: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.

Anthony S, Pol S, Selkirk E, Matthiesen A, Klaassen R, Manase D JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e57984.

PMID: 39298749 PMC: 11450352. DOI: 10.2196/57984.


A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing In-Person, Remote, and Blended Interventions in Physical Activity, Diet, Education, and Behavioral Modification on Gestational Weight Gain among Overweight or Obese Pregnant Individuals.

Yu H, Li M, Qian G, Yue S, Ossowski Z, Szumilewicz A Adv Nutr. 2024; 15(7):100253.

PMID: 38879168 PMC: 11267029. DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100253.

References
1.
Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw E, Cheater F, Flottorp S . Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (4):CD005470. PMC: 7271646. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub3. View

2.
Coorey G, Peiris D, Neubeck L, Redfern J . A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):764. PMC: 7433103. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05597-5. View

3.
Nilsen P . Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:53. PMC: 4406164. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0. View

4.
Shaw R, Sweet S, McBride C, Adair W, Martin Ginis K . Operationalizing the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the collective impact of autonomous community programs that promote health and well-being. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):803. PMC: 6591988. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7131-4. View

5.
Waltz T, Powell B, Fernandez M, Abadie B, Damschroder L . Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1):42. PMC: 6489173. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4. View