» Articles » PMID: 38126709

Clinical Implications of the Relationship Between Naltrexone Plasma Levels and the Subjective Effects of Heroin in Humans

Overview
Journal J Addict Med
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Dec 21
PMID 38126709
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extended-release naltrexone (NTX) is an opioid antagonist approved for relapse prevention after medical withdrawal. Its therapeutic effect is dependent on the NTX plasma level, and as it decreases, patients may lack protection against relapse and overdose. Therefore, identifying the minimally effective NTX level needed to block opioid-induced subjective effects has important clinical implications.

Methods: This secondary, individual-level analysis of data collected in a human laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between NTX levels and subjective effects of an intravenously administered 25-mg challenge dose of heroin in non-treatment-seeking participants with opioid use disorder (N = 12). Subjective ratings of drug liking using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and NTX levels were measured across 6 weeks after participants received a single injection of either extended-release NTX 192 mg (N = 6) or 384 mg (N = 6). Cubic spline mixed-effects models were used to provide 95% prediction intervals for individual changes in liking scores as a function of NTX levels.

Results: Naltrexone levels above 2 ng/mL blocked nearly all VAS ratings of drug liking after intravenous heroin administration. Participants with NTX levels ≥ 2 ng/mL had minimal (≤20 mm) changes from placebo in VAS ratings of drug liking based on 95% prediction intervals. In contrast, NTX levels < 2 ng/mL were associated with greater variability in individual-level subjective responses.

Conclusions: In clinical practice, a plasma level range of 1 to 2 ng/mL is considered to be therapeutic in providing heroin blockade. The current findings suggest that a higher level (>2 ng/mL) may be needed to produce a consistent blockade.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the antagonist effect of naltrexone implant via opioid challenge tests with escalating doses of hydromorphone injection in former heroin dependent patients.

Qu W, Wang X, Dong C, Zhang T, Yin S, Sun Z Front Psychiatry. 2025; 16:1441598.

PMID: 39950179 PMC: 11821577. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1441598.

References
1.
Alanis-Hirsch K, Croff R, Ford 2nd J, Johnson K, Chalk M, Schmidt L . Extended-Release Naltrexone: A Qualitative Analysis of Barriers to Routine Use. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015; 62:68-73. PMC: 4724460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.10.003. View

2.
Blanco C, Volkow N . Management of opioid use disorder in the USA: present status and future directions. Lancet. 2019; 393(10182):1760-1772. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33078-2. View

3.
Kummel A, Bonate P, Dingemanse J, Krause A . Confidence and Prediction Intervals for Pharmacometric Models. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2018; 7(6):360-373. PMC: 6027739. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12286. View

4.
Comer S, Burke T, Lewis J, Woods J . Clocinnamox: a novel, systemically-active, irreversible opioid antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992; 262(3):1051-6. View

5.
Lobmaier P, Kornor H, Kunoe N, Bjorndal A . Sustained-release naltrexone for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; (2):CD006140. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006140.pub2. View