» Articles » PMID: 20537615

Risk Factors for Craving and Relapse in Heroin Users Treated with Oral or Implant Naltrexone

Overview
Journal Biol Psychiatry
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 Jun 12
PMID 20537615
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Oral naltrexone effectively antagonizes heroin, but patient noncompliance limits its utility; sustained-release preparations may overcome this. Few data are available on optimal blood naltrexone levels for preventing craving and/or return to heroin use. This study assesses various risk factors, including blood naltrexone level, for heroin craving and relapse to illicit opioids.

Methods: Heroin-dependent persons from a randomized controlled trial of oral versus implant naltrexone were followed up for 6 months. Thirty-four participants received 50 mg oral naltrexone daily, plus placebo implant; thirty-five participants received a single dose of 2.3 g naltrexone implant, plus daily oral placebo tablets.

Results: Compared to oral naltrexone patients, implant naltrexone patients were significantly less likely to use any opioids and had one-fifth the risk of using heroin > or = weekly. Risk of > or = weekly heroin use increased by 2.5 times at blood naltrexone concentration < .5 ng/mL compared with > or = .5 ng/mL, with 3 ng/mL associated with very low risk of use. Craving remained near "floor" levels for implant patients but rebounded to higher levels among oral patients. Lower craving scores (< or = 20/70) predicted lower relapse risk. Noncompliance with daily oral formula, higher baseline craving, longer history of use, and being younger predicted higher craving at follow-up.

Conclusions: Implant naltrexone was better associated with reduced heroin craving and relapse than oral naltrexone. Effective treatment was achieved at blood naltrexone levels of 1 ng/mL to 3 ng/mL, with higher levels associated with greater efficacy. Craving assessment may be valuable in predicting relapse risk allowing timely intervention.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the antagonist effect of naltrexone implant via opioid challenge tests with escalating doses of hydromorphone injection in former heroin dependent patients.

Qu W, Wang X, Dong C, Zhang T, Yin S, Sun Z Front Psychiatry. 2025; 16:1441598.

PMID: 39950179 PMC: 11821577. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1441598.


Bioabsorbable, subcutaneous naltrexone implants mitigate fentanyl-induced respiratory depression at 3 months-A pilot study in male canines.

Joyner R, Hollenbaugh J, DAquila D, Fishman M, Cohen S, Holdai V Physiol Rep. 2024; 12(15):e16176.

PMID: 39118319 PMC: 11310269. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.16176.


Clinical Implications of the Relationship Between Naltrexone Plasma Levels and the Subjective Effects of Heroin in Humans.

Castillo F, Harris H, Lerman D, Bisaga A, Nunes E, Zhang Z J Addict Med. 2023; 18(2):110-114.

PMID: 38126709 PMC: 10939966. DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001247.


Association between body mass index and treatment completion in extended-release naltrexone-treated patients with opioid dependence.

Li X, Langleben D, Lynch K, Wang G, Elman I, Wiers C Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1247961.

PMID: 37599869 PMC: 10433165. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1247961.


Thermosensitive biomaterial gels with chemical permeation enhancers for enhanced microneedle delivery of naltrexone for managing opioid and alcohol dependency.

Tobin K, Brogden N Biomater Sci. 2023; 11(17):5846-5858.

PMID: 37455601 PMC: 10443048. DOI: 10.1039/d3bm00972f.