The Role of Ventral Tegmental Area in Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation: an Exploratory Study

Overview

Journal Front Neurol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Dec 20

PMID 38116106

Authors

Loukas G Astrakas

Sabrina Elbach

Irini Giannopulu

Shasha Li

Howard Benjafield

A Aria Tzika

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The acknowledged role of external rewards in chronic stroke rehabilitation, offering positive reinforcement and motivation, has significantly contributed to patient engagement and perseverance. However, the exploration of self-reward's importance in this context remains limited. This study aims to investigate the functional connectivity of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), a key node in the brain's reward circuitry, during motor task-based rehabilitation and its correlation with the recovery process.

Methods: Twelve right-handed healthy volunteers (4 men, 8 women, aged 57.4 ± 11.3 years) and twelve chronic stroke patients (5 men, 7 women, aged 48.1 ± 11.1 years) with clinically significant right-sided motor impairment (mean FM-UE score of 27.6 ± 8.7) participated. The analysis employed the CONN toolbox to assess the association between motor tasks and VTA connectivity using psychophysiological interaction (PPI).

Results: PPI analysis revealed motor-dependent changes in VTA connectivity, particularly with regions within the motor circuitry, cerebellum, and prefrontal cortex. Notably, stronger connectivity between the ipsilesional VTA and cerebellum was observed in healthy controls compared to chronic stroke patients, highlighting the importance of VTA-cerebellum interactions in motor function. Stroke patients' motor performance was associated with VTA modulation in areas related to both motor tasks and reward processing, emphasizing the role of self-reward processes in rehabilitation. Changes in VTA influence on motor circuitry were linked to improvements in motor performance resulting from rehabilitation.

Discussion: Our findings underscore the potential of neuroimaging techniques in quantifying and predicting rehabilitation outcomes by examining self-reward processes. The observed associations between VTA connectivity and motor performance in both healthy and stroke-affected individuals emphasize the role of psychological factors, particularly self-reward, in the rehabilitation process. This study contributes valuable insights into the intricate interplay between reward circuits and motor function, highlighting the importance of addressing psychological dimensions in neurorehabilitation strategies.

References

Bundt C, Abrahamse E, Braem S, Brass M, Notebaert W . Reward anticipation modulates primary motor cortex excitability during task preparation. Neuroimage. 2016; 142:483-488. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.013. View

Subramanian S, Massie C, Malcolm M, Levin M . Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 24(2):113-24. DOI: 10.1177/1545968309349941. View

Ramkumar P, Dekleva B, Cooler S, Miller L, Kording K . Premotor and Motor Cortices Encode Reward. PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0160851. PMC: 5001708. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160851. View

Tran D, Pajaro-Blazquez M, Daneault J, Gallegos J, Pons J, Fregni F . Combining Dopaminergic Facilitation with Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Therapy in Stroke Survivors: A Focused Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 95(6):459-74. PMC: 4866584. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000438. View

Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu T . A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007; 37(1):90-101. PMC: 2214855. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042. View

Kringelbach M . The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6(9):691-702. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1747. View

Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A . Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2012; 2(3):125-41. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2012.0073. View

Trojniar W, Klejbor I . Facilitatory effect of unilateral lesion of the ventral tegmental area on locomotor response to stimulation of the contralateral ventral tegmental area: involvement of GABAergic transmission. Brain Res. 1999; 842(2):419-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01865-x. View

Rogers R, Owen A, Middleton H, Williams E, Pickard J, Sahakian B . Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(20):9029-38. PMC: 6782753. View

10.

Patriarchi T, Cho J, Merten K, Howe M, Marley A, Xiong W . Ultrafast neuronal imaging of dopamine dynamics with designed genetically encoded sensors. Science. 2018; 360(6396). PMC: 6287765. DOI: 10.1126/science.aat4422. View

11.

Talhada D, Marklund N, Wieloch T, Kuric E, Ruscher K . Plasticity-Enhancing Effects of Levodopa Treatment after Stroke. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(19). PMC: 8508853. DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910226. View

12.

Dobkin B . Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(16):1677-84. PMC: 4106469. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp043511. View

13.

de Graaf J, Schepers V, Nijsse B, Van Heugten C, Post M, Visser-Meily J . The influence of psychological factors and mood on the course of participation up to four years after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 44(10):1855-1862. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1808089. View

14.

Murty V, Shermohammed M, Smith D, Carter R, Huettel S, Adcock R . Resting state networks distinguish human ventral tegmental area from substantia nigra. Neuroimage. 2014; 100:580-9. PMC: 4370842. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.047. View

15.

Chen K, Vincis R, Fontanini A . Disruption of Cortical Dopaminergic Modulation Impairs Preparatory Activity and Delays Licking Initiation. Cereb Cortex. 2019; 29(4):1802-1815. PMC: 6418393. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz005. View

16.

Gower A, Tiberi M . The Intersection of Central Dopamine System and Stroke: Potential Avenues Aiming at Enhancement of Motor Recovery. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2018; 10:18. PMC: 6043669. DOI: 10.3389/fnsyn.2018.00018. View

17.

Bracha H, Seitz D, Otemaa J, Glick S . Rotational movement (circling) in normal humans: sex difference and relationship to hand, foot and eye preference. Brain Res. 1987; 411(2):231-5. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91074-2. View

18.

Bostan A, Strick P . The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated network. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018; 19(6):338-350. PMC: 6503669. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-018-0002-7. View

19.

Galaro J, Celnik P, Chib V . Motor Cortex Excitability Reflects the Subjective Value of Reward and Mediates Its Effects on Incentive-Motivated Performance. J Neurosci. 2018; 39(7):1236-1248. PMC: 6381239. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1254-18.2018. View

20.

Jurkowlaniec E, Tokarski J, Trojniar W . Effect of unilateral ibotenate lesions of the ventral tegmental area on cortical and hippocampal EEG in freely behaving rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2004; 63(4):369-75. DOI: 10.55782/ane-2003-1476. View