» Articles » PMID: 38112195

Prevalence of Toxigenic in Hospitalized Patients in the Southwestern Province of Saudi Arabia: Confirmation Using the GeneXpert Analysis

Overview
Journal Libyan J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Dec 19
PMID 38112195
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

() is a leading cause of nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients worldwide. Stool samples were collected from 112 inpatients admitted to different hospitals and were screened for GDH + toxin A + B by immunoassay, and all positive samples by immunoassay were processed for molecular detection of using the GeneXpert assay. strains were detected in 12 (10.71%) out of 112 stool samples using the GDH + toxin A + B immunoassay method and toxigenic was confirmed in 5 stool samples using the GeneXpert molecular assay. strains were also detected in 7 (8.97%) out of 78 stool samples from intensive care unit patients, 3 (25%) out of 12 stool samples from internal medicine ward patients, 1 (11.11%) out of 9 stool samples from surgery ward patients, and 1 (10%) out of 10 stool samples from isolation ward patients using the GDH + toxin A + B immunoassay method and the toxigenic strain was confirmed in 1, 2, 1, and 1 stool samples, respectively, using the GeneXpert molecular assay. Toxigenic was confirmed in patients at 4 (51.14%) out of 7 hospitals. In the present study, we also analyzed the clinical information of patients with -positive stool samples who were receiving one or more antibiotics during hospitalization. The binary toxin gene (), the gene, and the strain polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotype 027 were not detected using the GeneXpert molecular assay among 12 positive samples by immunoassay. This study should aid in the prevention of unnecessary empiric therapy and increase the understanding of the toxigenic burden on the healthcare system in the southwestern province of Saudi Arabia.

Citing Articles

Advances in diagnostic assays for infection in adults.

Liu D, Chen S, Hu R, Qiu Y, Chen K, Xu Y Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1492511.

PMID: 39720791 PMC: 11666450. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1492511.

References
1.
Obaid N, Alhifany A . infections in Saudi Arabia: Where are we standing?. Saudi Pharm J. 2020; 28(9):1118-1121. PMC: 7474162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.07.013. View

2.
Riddle D, Dubberke E . Clostridium difficile infection in the intensive care unit. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009; 23(3):727-43. PMC: 2726831. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2009.04.011. View

3.
Hawkey P, Marriott C, Liu W, Jian Z, Gao Q, Ling T . Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in a major chinese hospital: an underrecognized problem in Asia?. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51(10):3308-13. PMC: 3811633. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00587-13. View

4.
Lanis J, Heinlen L, James J, Ballard J . Clostridium difficile 027/BI/NAP1 encodes a hypertoxic and antigenically variable form of TcdB. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9(8):e1003523. PMC: 3731247. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003523. View

5.
Warny M, Pepin J, Fang A, Killgore G, Thompson A, Brazier J . Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet. 2005; 366(9491):1079-84. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67420-X. View