» Articles » PMID: 38082175

Sexting in Young Adults: A Normative Sexual Behavior

Overview
Journal Arch Sex Behav
Date 2023 Dec 11
PMID 38082175
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the advancement of technology, sexting has become more prominent in high school and university samples. The current study examined the rates and characteristics of sexting among an online sample of 2,828 young adults aged 18-30, primarily from the U.S. and Canada. We found that most participants sext (81%), sext often (most report ≥ 11 sexts), and start young (most by 16-17 years of age). Common reasons for sexting echoed reasons for participating in other normative sexual behaviors, including that it was sexually arousing, they were asked and wanted to reciprocate, or they wanted to flirt. Sexual coercion was a gendered phenomenon, with 1 in 10 cisgender women and 1 in 50 cisgender men reporting having sent a sext due to being threatened. The body parts captured in cisgender men's sexts were more diverse, whereas cisgender women focused on their chest, underwear/genitalia, and stomach. Sexual orientation was also found to be a relevant factor, with different patterns in sexting experiences emerging across identities. The current study adds to the mounting evidence that sexting is a normative sexual behavior. Sexual education programs should provide youth with information on consent and safe sexting practices rather than follow an abstinence approach.

Citing Articles

Safe Sexting, Sexual Orientation, and Gender: Risky Sexting in a Community Sample.

Holmes E, Babchishin K Arch Sex Behav. 2024; .

PMID: 39733184 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-03050-w.

References
1.
Ayinmoro A, Uzobo E, Teibowei B, Fred J . Sexting and other risky sexual behaviour among female students in a Nigerian academic institution. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020; 15(2):116-121. PMC: 7184208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.02.007. View

2.
Brodie Z, Wilson C, Scott G . Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social-Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2019; 48(8):2367-2379. PMC: 6757024. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w. View

3.
Champion A, Oswald F, Khera D, Pedersen C . Examining the Gendered Impacts of Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence: A Mixed Methods Approach. Arch Sex Behav. 2022; 51(3):1607-1624. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02226-y. View

4.
Cornelius T, Bell K, Kistler T, Drouin M . Consensual Sexting among College Students: The Interplay of Coercion and Intimate Partner Aggression in Perceived Consequences of Sexting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(19). PMC: 7579237. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197141. View

5.
DeHaan S, Kuper L, Magee J, Bigelow L, Mustanski B . The interplay between online and offline explorations of identity, relationships, and sex: a mixed-methods study with LGBT youth. J Sex Res. 2012; 50(5):421-34. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2012.661489. View