Importance:
The existing literature on sexting among youth shows that sexting is a predictor of sexual behavior and may be associated with other health outcomes and risky behaviors. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the prevalence of sexting, which is needed to inform future research, intervention, and policy development.
Objective:
To provide a meta-analytic synthesis of studies examining the prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior, analyzed by age, sex, geography, and method of sexting.
Data Sources:
In an academic setting, electronic searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science were conducted for the period January 1990 to June 2016, yielding 1147 nonduplicate records.
Study Selection:
Studies were included if participants were younger than 18 years and the prevalence of sexting explicit images, videos, or messages was reported.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
Literature review and data extraction followed established PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted all relevant data. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to derive the mean prevalence rates. Thirty-nine studies met final inclusion criteria.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Meta-analyses of the prevalence of sending, receiving, and forwarding without consent, as well as having one's sext forwarded without consent.
Results:
Among 39 included studies, there were 110 380 participants; the mean age was 15.16 years (age range, 11.9-17.0 years), and on average 47.2% were male. Studies were available for sending (n = 34), receiving (n = 20), forwarding without consent (n = 5), and having a sext forwarded without consent (n = 4). The mean prevalences for sending and receiving sexts were 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) and 27.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-31.7%), respectively. Moderator analyses revealed that effect sizes varied as a function of child age (prevalence increased with age), year of data collection (prevalence increased over time), and sexting method (higher prevalence on mobile devices compared with computers). The prevalence of forwarding a sext without consent was 12.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-15.6%), and the prevalence of having a sext forwarded without consent was 8.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-12.0%).
Conclusions And Relevance:
The prevalence of sexting has increased in recent years and increases as youth age. Further research focusing on nonconsensual sexting is necessary to appropriately target and inform intervention, education, and policy efforts.
Citing Articles
Parental and Artificial Intelligence Perspectives on Adolescent Sexting: A Comparative Analysis.
Ricon T, Dolev-Cohen M
Arch Sex Behav. 2025; .
PMID: 40069429
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-025-03100-x.
From digital harm to recovery: a multidisciplinary framework for First Aid after Online Sexual Abuse.
Knipschild R, Covers M, Bicanic I
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025; 16(1):2465083.
PMID: 40012502
PMC: 11869328.
DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2465083.
Validation and adaptation of the diffusion of intimate images among adolescents (EDIMA) scale in adolescents from Peru.
Figueroa-Quinones J, Ipanaque-Zapata M, Rivera-Lozada O, Villalobos-Quiroz C, Vilcabana-Burgos A, Valle-Chafloque I
Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1399423.
PMID: 39759416
PMC: 11695780.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1399423.
Online Sexual Risk Behaviors in Adolescents: Roles of Family Relationships, Impulsivity, and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Chou W, Liu T, Hsiao R, Yen C
Children (Basel). 2024; 11(10).
PMID: 39457164
PMC: 11505675.
DOI: 10.3390/children11101199.
Understanding U.S. Caregivers' Perceptions of Youth's Sexting Motivations and Concerns About Their Children's Sexting Involvement: Fall ConsumerStyles Survey, 2018 and 2019.
Steele-Baser M, Allen C, Mercado M, Cooper A, Wagner R
Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 53(10):3747-3757.
PMID: 39214952
PMC: 11588500.
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02989-0.
Prevalence of online sexual harassment and online bullying: a nationwide survey among high school students in Denmark.
Nielsen M, Pisinger V, Kusier A, Tolstrup J
Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1368360.
PMID: 39171309
PMC: 11335486.
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368360.
Risk Factors for Non-Consensual Sexting Among Adolescents and Emerging Adults: An Extension of the Routine Activity Theory Perspective.
Dodaj A, Sesar K, Prijatelj K, Mandic S, Bursac S
Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 53(7):2583-2596.
PMID: 38862864
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02903-8.
School prevention of non-consensual sexting among middle adolescents: Does sexual preoccupation awareness matter?.
Touloupis T
Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1384620.
PMID: 38845767
PMC: 11153775.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384620.
Sin in the Digital Flesh? Religiosity and the Sexting Behavior of Women and Men in the United States.
Upenieks L, Chakraborty R, Hill T
J Relig Health. 2024; 63(4):3105-3133.
PMID: 38753133
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-024-02059-8.
Crimes without a body: reflections on a case series of online crimes.
Barbieri C, Grattagliano I, Catanesi R
Forensic Sci Res. 2024; 8(4):328-331.
PMID: 38405629
PMC: 10894059.
DOI: 10.1093/fsr/owad035.
Sexual health variation among gang-involved youth in Washington state: Social ecological implications for research and practice.
Bishop A, Nurius P, Walker S, Oxford M
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024; 56(1):16-29.
PMID: 38391121
PMC: 11026090.
DOI: 10.1111/psrh.12251.
A Latent Profile Analysis of Greek University Students' Sexting Profiles: Associations with Big Five Personality Traits.
Kokkinos C, Krommida C, Markos A, Voulgaridou I
Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 53(3):1129-1140.
PMID: 38151570
PMC: 10920438.
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02762-9.
Sexting in Young Adults: A Normative Sexual Behavior.
Thorne E, Babchishin K, Fisico R, Healey L
Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 53(2):593-609.
PMID: 38082175
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02728-x.
The Mental Health and Social Implications of Nonconsensual Sharing of Intimate Images on Youth: A Systematic Review.
Schmidt F, Varese F, Larkin A, Bucci S
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023; 25(3):2158-2172.
PMID: 37970838
PMC: 11155207.
DOI: 10.1177/15248380231207896.
Prevalence and risk factors for nonconsensual distribution of intimate images among Italian young adults: Implications for prevention and intervention.
Brighi A, Amadori A, Summerer K, Menin D
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023; 23(4):100414.
PMID: 37772270
PMC: 10523183.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100414.
Sexting and Behavioral Health in First-time Justice-Involved Adolescents.
Ng M, Harrison A, Bath E, Kemp K, Galbraith K, Brown L
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2023; 132.
PMID: 37745773
PMC: 10516529.
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106298.
Experiences of Online Sexual Violence: Interviews With Swedish Teenage Girls in Psychiatric Care.
Rindestig F, Gadin K, Dennhag I
Violence Against Women. 2023; 31(1):266-290.
PMID: 37735901
PMC: 11610211.
DOI: 10.1177/10778012231203000.
Sexting Behaviors Before and During COVID-19 in Italian and Colombian Young Adults.
Morelli M, Gomez Plata M, Isolani S, Zapata Zabala M, Cabas Hoyos K, Tirado L
Sex Res Social Policy. 2023; :1-13.
PMID: 37363349
PMC: 9986041.
DOI: 10.1007/s13178-023-00798-z.
Victims of Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Scoping Review.
Chauvire-Geib K, Fegert J
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023; 25(2):1335-1348.
PMID: 37313793
PMC: 10913305.
DOI: 10.1177/15248380231178754.
A Qualitative Study of How Israeli Arab Educational Counselors Handle Image-Based Sexual Abuse of Female Adolescents.
Dolev-Cohen M
Violence Against Women. 2023; 30(14):3656-3675.
PMID: 37278011
PMC: 11538759.
DOI: 10.1177/10778012231179219.