» Articles » PMID: 38067610

Effect of Fragment 1 on the Binding of Epigallocatechin Gallate to the PD-L1 Dimer Explored by Molecular Dynamics

Overview
Journal Molecules
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Dec 9
PMID 38067610
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Blocking the interaction between programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) by directly targeting the PD-L1 dimer has emerged as a hot topic in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a natural product, has been demonstrated binding to the PD-L1 dimer in our previous study, but has a weaker binding capacity, moreover, EGCG is located at the end of the binding pocket of the PD-L1 dimer. The inhibitor fragment 1 (FRA) lies at the other end. So, we proposed that the introduction of FRA might be able to improve the binding ability. To illuminate this issue, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was performed in the present study. Binding free energy calculations show that the binding affinity is significantly increased by 17 kcal/mol upon the introduction of FRA. It may be due to the energy contributions of emerging key residues Tyr56, Met115, Tyr123, Ile54 and the enhanced contributions of initial key residues Tyr123 and Val68. Binding mode and non-bonded interaction results indicate that FRA_EGCG (EGCG in combination with FRA) binds to the C-, F- and G-sheet of the PD-L1 dimer. Importantly, the introduction of FRA mainly strengthened the nonpolar interactions. The free energy landscape and secondary structure results further show that FRA_EGCG can interact with the PD-L1 dimer more stably. These data demonstrated here provide the theoretical basis for screening two or more natural products with additive inhibitory effect on this pathway and therefore exerting more effective anticancer immunity.

References
1.
Zhu J, Lv Y, Han X, Xu D, Han W . Understanding the differences of the ligand binding/unbinding pathways between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated ARH1 using molecular dynamics simulations. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):12439. PMC: 5622063. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12031-0. View

2.
Cheng B, Yuan W, Su J, Liu Y, Chen J . Recent advances in small molecule based cancer immunotherapy. Eur J Med Chem. 2018; 157:582-598. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.08.028. View

3.
Dehury B, Behera S, Mahapatra N . Structural dynamics of Casein Kinase I (CKI) from malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum (Isolate 3D7): Insights from theoretical modelling and molecular simulations. J Mol Graph Model. 2016; 71:154-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.11.012. View

4.
da Penha Valente R, Souza R, de Medeiros Muniz G, Ferreira J, de Miranda R, E Lima A . Using Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulation to elucidate the effects of the T198F mutation on the molecular flexibility of the West Nile virus envelope protein. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):9625. PMC: 7296010. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66344-8. View

5.
Guo Y, Liang J, Liu B, Jin Y . Molecular Mechanism of Food-Derived Polyphenols on PD-L1 Dimerization: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(20). PMC: 8535905. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222010924. View