Histogram Analysis of Mono-exponential, Bi-exponential and Stretched-exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Predicting Consistency of Meningiomas
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The consistency of meningiomas is critical to determine surgical planning and has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. Our aim was to compare mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential MR diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting the consistency of meningiomas before surgery.
Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed meningiomas were prospectively enrolled in this study. Two senior neurosurgeons independently evaluated tumour consistency and classified them into soft and hard groups. A volume of interest was placed on the preoperative MR diffusion images to outline the whole tumour area. Histogram parameters (mean, median, 10th percentile, 90th percentile, kurtosis, skewness) were extracted from 6 different diffusion maps including ADC (DWI), D*, D, f (IVIM), alpha and DDC (SEM). Comparisons between two groups were made using Student's t-Test or Mann-Whitney U test. Parameters with significant differences between the two groups were included for Receiver operating characteristic analysis. The DeLong test was used to compare AUCs.
Results: DDC, D* and ADC 10th percentile were significantly lower in hard tumours than in soft tumours (P ≤ 0.05). The alpha 90th percentile was significantly higher in hard tumours than in soft tumours (P < 0.02). For all histogram parameters, the alpha 90th percentile yielded the highest AUC of 0.88, with an accuracy of 85.10%. The D* 10th percentile had a relatively higher AUC value, followed by the DDC and ADC 10th percentile. The alpha 90th percentile had a significantly greater AUC value than the ADC 10th percentile (P ≤ 0.05). The D* 10th percentile had a significantly greater AUC value than the ADC 10th percentile and DDC 10th percentile (P ≤ 0.03).
Conclusion: Histogram parameters of Alpha and D* may serve as better imaging biomarkers to aid in predicting the consistency of meningioma.
Bi Q, Deng Y, Xu N, Wu S, Zhang H, Huang Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(1):121-134.
PMID: 39839005 PMC: 11744118. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-896.
Wang W, Wang L, Zhou J, Liu T, Bai Y, Wang M Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1456701.
PMID: 39544290 PMC: 11560797. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1456701.
Contribution of advanced neuroimaging in diagnosis of cerebral syphilitic gumma: a case report.
Shen X, Zhu Z, Li X, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhang B Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1442176.
PMID: 39206117 PMC: 11349654. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1442176.
He L, Qin Y, Hu Q, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Ai T Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):71.
PMID: 38658999 PMC: 11044413. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01828-3.