» Articles » PMID: 39544290

Grading of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Nov 15
PMID 39544290
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monoexponential, biexponential and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) models in the grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Materials And Methods: Fifty-one patients with pathologically proven ccRCC underwent DWI with fifteen factors (0, 10, 30, 50, 70, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1500, 2000 sec/mm²) on a 3.0T MR scanner. The isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (ADC), pseudodiffusion coefficient (ADC), and fraction of perfusion (f) were derived from DWI using a biexponential model. The water diffusion heterogeneity index (α) and distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) were derived from DWI using a stretched-exponential model. All values were calculated for the solid area of tumors and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC. The Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for statistical analysis. The DeLong test was performed to compare the ROC curves.

Results: The mean ADC, DDC, ADC and α values were significantly lower in high-grade ccRCC than in low-grade ccRCC (P< 0.01). However, the ADC and f were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). According to the ROC analyses, the AUC for α was 0.941, which was significantly greater than those of the other parameters, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 84.2%. The DeLong test showed that there were significant differences in the ROCs among ADC/ADC, ADC/α, f/ADC, ADC/ADC, f/α, DDC/α, and f/ADC.

Conclusions: Diffusion-related parameters (ADC, DDC, ADC and α) could be used to distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. The α derived from the stretched-exponential model may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC.

References
1.
Goyal A, Sharma R, Bhalla A, Gamanagatti S, Seth A, Iyer V . Diffusion-weighted MRI in renal cell carcinoma: a surrogate marker for predicting nuclear grade and histological subtype. Acta Radiol. 2012; 53(3):349-58. DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.110415. View

2.
Rosenkrantz A, Niver B, Fitzgerald E, Babb J, Chandarana H, Melamed J . Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(5):W344-51. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4688. View

3.
Jerome N, Vidic I, Egnell L, Sjobakk T, Ostlie A, Fjosne H . Understanding diffusion-weighted MRI analysis: Repeatability and performance of diffusion models in a benign breast lesion cohort. NMR Biomed. 2021; 34(7):e4508. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4508. View

4.
Ye J, Xu Q, Wang S, Zheng J, Dou W . Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2019; 27(7):e176-e182. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010. View

5.
Wen D, Peng P, Yue X, Xu C, Pu Q, Ming Y . Comparative study of stretched-exponential and kurtosis models of diffusion-weighted imaging in renal assessment to distinguish patients with primary aldosteronism from healthy controls. PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0298207. PMC: 10852313. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298207. View