» Articles » PMID: 38050534

Safety of Removal of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Children in the Supine Versus Lateral Position in a Deep Plane of Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2023 Dec 5
PMID 38050534
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: When a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is removed with the child in a deep plane of anesthesia, the upper airway muscle tone and protective upper airway reflexes may be obtunded.

Objective: To determine whether the supine or lateral position is safer for the removal of a PLMA in deeply anesthetized children by comparing the incidence of upper airway complications.

Methods: This randomized single-blind comparative trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital between January 2020 and September 2020. Forty children of the American Society of Anesthesiologists class I/II of ages 1-12 years age undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with PLMA used as the definitive airway device were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to lateral group or supine group for PLMA removal in a deep plane of anesthesia in the lateral or supine position. The primary outcome was the number of patients experiencing one or more upper airway complications and the secondary outcomes were incidence of individual respiratory adverse effects and of severe airway complications.

Results: The incidence of airway complications was 30% in the supine group and 20% in the lateral group ( = 0.6641). Incidence of laryngospasm, immediate stridor, and excessive secretions were similar. Early stridor and oxygen desaturation were higher in the supine group ( = 0.0374, = 0.0183 respectively).

Interpretation: The overall incidence of upper airway complications was similar with the removal of a PLMA in the supine or lateral position in deeply anesthetized children. The incidence of oxygen desaturation and stridor were higher with PLMA removal in the supine as compared to the lateral position.

Citing Articles

Safety of removal of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children in the supine versus lateral position in a deep plane of anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

Dhiman S, Bhalotra A, Sharma K Pediatr Investig. 2023; 7(4):233-238.

PMID: 38050534 PMC: 10693662. DOI: 10.1002/ped4.12401.

References
1.
Lee J, Kim S, Kim C, Yoon T, Kim H . Minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway removal in anesthetized children. Anesth Analg. 2007; 104(3):528-31. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253035.96490.22. View

2.
Lopez-Gil M, Mantilla I, Blanco T, Teigell E, Hervias M, Fernandez-Lopez R . The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012; 22(4):365-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03801.x. View

3.
White M, Cook T, Stoddart P . A critique of elective pediatric supraglottic airway devices. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009; 19 Suppl 1:55-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02997.x. View

4.
Ramgolam A, Hall G, Zhang G, Hegarty M, von Ungern-Sternberg B . Deep or awake removal of laryngeal mask airway in children at risk of respiratory adverse events undergoing tonsillectomy-a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120(3):571-580. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.094. View

5.
Thomas-Kattappurathu G, Kasisomayajula A, Short J . Best position and depth of anaesthesia for laryngeal mask airway removal in children: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015; 32(9):624-30. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000286. View