Brain Connectivity and Academic Skills in English Learners

Overview

Journal Cereb Cortex

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Dec 3

PMID 38044467

Authors

Tehila Nugiel

Damion V Demeter

Mackenzie E Mitchell

AnnaCarolina Garza

Arturo E Hernandez

Jenifer Juranek

Jessica A Church

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

English learners (ELs) are a rapidly growing population in schools in the United States with limited experience and proficiency in English. To better understand the path for EL's academic success in school, it is important to understand how EL's brain systems are used for academic learning in English. We studied, in a cohort of Hispanic middle-schoolers (n = 45, 22F) with limited English proficiency and a wide range of reading and math abilities, brain network properties related to academic abilities. We applied a method for localizing brain regions of interest (ROIs) that are group-constrained, yet individually specific, to test how resting state functional connectivity between regions that are important for academic learning (reading, math, and cognitive control regions) are related to academic abilities. ROIs were selected from task localizers probing reading and math skills in the same participants. We found that connectivity across all ROIs, as well as connectivity of just the cognitive control ROIs, were positively related to measures of reading skills but not math skills. This work suggests that cognitive control brain systems have a central role for reading in ELs. Our results also indicate that an individualized approach for localizing brain function may clarify brain-behavior relationships.

References

Julian J, Fedorenko E, Webster J, Kanwisher N . An algorithmic method for functionally defining regions of interest in the ventral visual pathway. Neuroimage. 2012; 60(4):2357-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.055. View

Fox M, Snyder A, Vincent J, Raichle M . Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior. Neuron. 2007; 56(1):171-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.023. View

Beckmann C, Jenkinson M, Smith S . General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI. Neuroimage. 2003; 20(2):1052-63. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00435-X. View

Reuter M, Rosas H, Fischl B . Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: a robust approach. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(4):1181-96. PMC: 2946852. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.020. View

Younger J, Tucker-Drob E, Booth J . Longitudinal changes in reading network connectivity related to skill improvement. Neuroimage. 2017; 158:90-98. PMC: 5614832. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.044. View

Poldrack R . Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008; 2(1):67-70. PMC: 2555436. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsm006. View

Finn E, Scheinost D, Finn D, Shen X, Papademetris X, Constable R . Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity?. Neuroimage. 2017; 160:140-151. PMC: 8808247. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.064. View

Sokolowski H, Fias W, Mousa A, Ansari D . Common and distinct brain regions in both parietal and frontal cortex support symbolic and nonsymbolic number processing in humans: A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2016; 146:376-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.028. View

Wilkey E, Price G . Attention to number: The convergence of numerical magnitude processing, attention, and mathematics in the inferior frontal gyrus. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 40(3):928-943. PMC: 6615546. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24422. View

10.

Bauer J, Martinez J, Roe M, Church J . Consistent Performance Differences between Children and Adults Despite Manipulation of Cue-Target Variables. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1304. PMC: 5541061. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01304. View

11.

Bullmore E, Bassett D . Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010; 7:113-40. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143934. View

12.

Fries P . A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(10):474-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011. View

13.

Horowitz-Kraus T, Vannest J, Gozdas E, Holland S . Greater Utilization of Neural-Circuits Related to Executive Functions is Associated with Better Reading: A Longitudinal fMRI Study Using the Verb Generation Task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:447. PMC: 4064667. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00447. View

14.

Murphy K, Birn R, Handwerker D, Jones T, Bandettini P . The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced?. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):893-905. PMC: 2750906. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036. View

15.

Luk G, Bialystok E . Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013; 25(5):605-621. PMC: 3780436. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.795574. View

16.

Cohen J, DEsposito M . The Segregation and Integration of Distinct Brain Networks and Their Relationship to Cognition. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(48):12083-12094. PMC: 5148214. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2965-15.2016. View

17.

Guimera R, Nunes Amaral L . Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature. 2005; 433(7028):895-900. PMC: 2175124. DOI: 10.1038/nature03288. View

18.

Emerson R, Cantlon J . Early math achievement and functional connectivity in the fronto-parietal network. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012; 2 Suppl 1:S139-51. PMC: 3375498. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.003. View

19.

Van Rinsveld A, Dricot L, Guillaume M, Rossion B, Schiltz C . Mental arithmetic in the bilingual brain: Language matters. Neuropsychologia. 2017; 101:17-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.009. View

20.

Nikki Arrington C, Kulesz P, Francis D, Fletcher J, Barnes M . The Contribution of Attentional Control and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension and Decoding. Sci Stud Read. 2023; 18(5):325-346. PMC: 9891492. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2014.902461. View