» Articles » PMID: 38033876

Crouzon Syndrome Spanning Three Generations: Advances in the Treatment of Syndromic Midface Deficiency

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Nov 30
PMID 38033876
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Crouzon syndrome is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by craniosynostosis, midface retrusion, and exophthalmos. Over the past century, the treatment of craniofacial disorders like Crouzon syndrome has evolved significantly.

Methods: An institutional review board-approved retrospective study was conducted to ascertain the treatment of three individuals with Crouzon syndrome from one family, complemented with a series of literature searches to examine the evolution of craniofacial surgical history.

Results: Dr. David Williams Cheever developed the Le Fort I level to correct malocclusion, maxillomandibular malformations, and midface hypoplasia. Later, Dr. Paul Tessier introduced the Le Fort II and III osteotomies to treat syndromic midface hypoplasia. In 1978, Dr. Fernando Ortiz-Monasterio and Dr. Antonio Fuente del Campo published the first series of monobloc osteotomies, allowing for simultaneous correction of supraorbital and midface malformations, although complicated by blood loss and high infection rates. In 1992, McCarthy et al introduced the concept of gradual distraction to the craniofacial skeleton. In 1995, Polley et al performed the first monobloc advancement using external distraction. Subsequently, in 1997, Polley and Figueroa introduced a rigid external distraction device with multiple vector control to manage severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia. The technique was further refined and applied to treat syndromic midface hypoplasia, reducing complication rates. Currently, either external or internal distraction approaches are used to safely treat this challenging group of patients.

Conclusion: The treatment of syndromic midface deficiency has significantly evolved over the past 50 years, as evidenced by this report of three generations of Crouzon syndrome.

References
1.
Rahimov C, Asadov R, Hajiyeva G, Verdiyev N, Novruzov Z, Farzaliyev I . Crouzon syndrome: Virtual planning of surgical treatment by application of internal distractors. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 6(1):135-40. PMC: 4979330. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.186144. View

2.
Helman S, Badhey A, Kadakia S, Myers E . Revisiting Crouzon syndrome: reviewing the background and management of a multifaceted disease. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 18(4):373-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-014-0467-0. View

3.
Nout E, Koudstaal M, Wolvius E, van der Wal K . Additional orthognathic surgery following Le Fort III and monobloc advancement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40(7):679-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.02.014. View

4.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr J . Cephalometric variables predicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126(1):16-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.010. View

5.
Hammoudeh J, Goel P, Wolfswinkel E, Fahradyan A, Vartanian E, Garg R . Simultaneous Midface Advancement and Orthognathic Surgery: A Powerful Technique for Managing Midface Hypoplasia and Malocclusion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145(6):1067e-1072e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006816. View